Marcus Philip I, Ngunjiri John M, Sekellick Margaret J
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Center of Excellence for Vaccine Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269, USA.
J Virol. 2009 Aug;83(16):8122-30. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02680-08. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
The dynamic changes in the temporal appearance and quantity of a new class of influenza virus, noninfectious cell-killing particles (niCKP), were compared to defective interfering particles (DIP). After a single high-multiplicity passage in MDCK cells of an egg-derived stock that lacked detectable niCKP or DIP, both classes of particles appeared in large numbers (>5 x 10(8)/ml), and the plaque-forming particle (PFP) titer dropped approximately 60-fold. After two additional serial high-multiplicity passages the DIP remained relatively constant, the DIP/niCKP ratio reached 10:1, and the PFP had declined by about 10,000-fold. Together, the niCKP and DIP subpopulations constituted ca. 20% of the total hemagglutinating particle population in which these noninfectious biologically active particles (niBAP) were subsumed. DIP neither killed cells nor interfered with the cell-killing (apoptosis-inducing) activity of niCKP or PFP (infectious CKP), even though they blocked the replication of PFP. Relative to the UV-target of approximately 13,600 nucleotides (nt) for inactivation of PFP, the UV target for niCKP was approximately 2,400 nt, consistent with one of the polymerase subunit genes, and that for DIP was approximately 350 nt, consistent with the small DI-RNA responsible for DIP-mediated interference. Thus, niCKP and DIP are viewed as distinct particles with a propensity to form during infection at high multiplicities. These conditions are postulated to cause aberrations in the temporally regulated replication of virus and its packaging, leading to the production of niBAP. DIP have been implicated in the virulence of influenza virus, but the role of niCKP is yet unknown.
将一类新型流感病毒——非感染性细胞杀伤颗粒(niCKP)的时间外观和数量的动态变化与缺陷干扰颗粒(DIP)进行了比较。在缺乏可检测到的niCKP或DIP的鸡蛋来源毒株在MDCK细胞中进行单次高倍传代后,这两类颗粒大量出现(>5×10⁸/ml),且噬斑形成颗粒(PFP)滴度下降了约60倍。在另外两次连续高倍传代后,DIP保持相对稳定,DIP/niCKP比值达到10:1,PFP下降了约10000倍。niCKP和DIP亚群共同构成了包含这些非感染性生物活性颗粒(niBAP)的总血凝颗粒群体的约20%。DIP既不杀死细胞,也不干扰niCKP或PFP(感染性CKP)的细胞杀伤(诱导凋亡)活性,尽管它们会阻断PFP的复制。相对于使PFP失活的约13600个核苷酸(nt)的紫外线靶点,niCKP的紫外线靶点约为2400 nt,与一种聚合酶亚基基因一致,而DIP的紫外线靶点约为350 nt,与负责DIP介导干扰的小DI-RNA一致。因此,niCKP和DIP被视为在高倍感染期间倾向于形成的不同颗粒。推测这些条件会导致病毒在时间上受调控的复制及其包装出现异常,从而产生niBAP。DIP与流感病毒的毒力有关,但niCKP的作用尚不清楚。