Kohner Peggy C, Robberts Frans J L, Cockerill Franklin R, Patel Robin
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Aug;47(8):2419-25. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00508-09. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
The acquisition of beta-lactamases in members of the Enterobacteriaceae family poses a challenge to antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the clinical laboratory. We correlated the distribution of the MICs for Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli with the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase (pAmpC) genes. A total of 264 isolates were subjected to cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam agar dilution MIC determination; ESBL screening and confirmatory testing by the methods of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); and for isolates for which the MICs of extended-spectrum cephalosporins were > or =1 microg/ml or the MICs of cefpodoxime were >4 microg/ml, PCR amplification and sequencing of the ESBL and pAmpC genes. PCR was positive for 73/81 isolates (45 isolates with an ESBL gene alone, 24 isolates with a pAmpC gene alone, with 4 isolates with both genes). Compared to PCR, confirmatory testing by the CLSI method yielded a sensitivity and a specificity of 98.0 and 96.3%, respectively; there were six false-positive results and one false-negative result. No distinction in the MIC distribution was apparent between isolates with the ESBL gene and isolates with the pAmpC gene. A substantial percentage of the isolates with PCR-confirmed ESBL and/or pAmpC genes fell within the current CLSI susceptible category. For a ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, or cefotaxime MIC of > or =2 microg/ml, a dichotomy existed between isolates with and without ESBL and pAmpC genes in most cases. This suggests that the presence of the ESBL and the pAmpC enzymes may yield similar MICs of extended-spectrum cephalosporins, many of which fall within the current nonresistant categories. Lowering of the current CLSI breakpoints for cephalosporins appears to be warranted.
肠杆菌科细菌中β-内酰胺酶的获得对临床实验室的抗菌药物敏感性检测构成了挑战。我们将克雷伯菌属和大肠杆菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)分布与超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和质粒介导的AmpCβ-内酰胺酶(pAmpC)基因的存在情况进行了关联分析。总共264株分离菌接受了头孢唑林、头孢曲松、头孢噻肟、头孢他啶、头孢吡肟和氨曲南的琼脂稀释法MIC测定;采用临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的方法进行ESBL筛查和确证试验;对于超广谱头孢菌素MIC≥1μg/ml或头孢泊肟MIC>4μg/ml的分离菌,进行ESBL和pAmpC基因的PCR扩增及测序。73/81株分离菌PCR结果呈阳性(45株仅携带ESBL基因,24株仅携带pAmpC基因,4株同时携带这两种基因)。与PCR相比,CLSI方法确证试验的敏感性和特异性分别为98.0%和96.3%;有6例假阳性结果和1例假阴性结果。携带ESBL基因的分离菌和携带pAmpC基因的分离菌之间的MIC分布没有明显差异。相当比例的经PCR确证携带ESBL和/或pAmpC基因的分离菌属于目前CLSI定义的敏感类别。对于头孢他啶、头孢曲松或头孢噻肟MIC≥2μg/ml的情况,在大多数情况下,携带和不携带ESBL及pAmpC基因的分离菌之间存在差异。这表明ESBL和pAmpC酶的存在可能使超广谱头孢菌素产生相似的MIC,其中许多处于目前的非耐药类别范围内。降低目前CLSI头孢菌素的断点似乎是必要 的。