Tenover Fred C, Raney Patti M, Williams Portia P, Rasheed J Kamile, Biddle James W, Oliver Antonio, Fridkin Scott K, Jevitt Laura, McGowan John E
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jul;41(7):3142-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3142-3146.2003.
To determine whether confirmatory tests for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in Escherichia coli are necessary, we selected 131 E. coli isolates that met the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) screening criteria for potential ESBL production from the Project ICARE (Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology) strain collection. For all 131 isolates, the broth microdilution (BMD) MIC of at least one extended-spectrum cephalosporin was >/=2 micro g/ml. For 21 of 131 (16%) isolates, the ESBL confirmatory test was positive; i.e., the BMD MICs of ceftazidime or cefotaxime decreased by >/=3 doubling dilutions in the presence of clavulanic acid (CA) or the disk diffusion zone diameters increased by >/=5 mm around ceftazidime or cefotaxime disks in the presence of CA. All 21 isolates were shown by PCR to contain at least one of the genes bla(TEM), bla(SHV), and bla(OXA), and in isoelectric focusing (IEF) tests, all isolates demonstrated at least one beta-lactamase band consistent with a TEM, SHV, or OXA enzyme. Of the 21 isolates, 3 showed a CA effect for cefotaxime by BMD but not by disk diffusion testing. A total of 59 (45%) of the 131 isolates demonstrated decreased susceptibility to cefpodoxime alone (MIC = 2 to 4 micro g/ml), and none had a positive ESBL confirmatory test result. These were classified as false positives according to ESBL screen test results. For the remaining 51 (39%) isolates, the cefpodoxime MICs ranged from 16 to >128 micro g/ml and the MICs for the other extended-spectrum cephalosporins were highly variable. All 51 isolates gave negative ESBL confirmatory test results. Most showed IEF profiles consistent with production of both a TEM and an AmpC beta-lactamase, and representative isolates of several phenotypic groups showed changes in porin profiles; these 51 isolates were considered true negatives. In all, only 16% of 131 E. coli isolates identified as potential ESBL producers by the current NCCLS screening criteria were confirmed as ESBL producers. Thus, changing the interpretation of extended-spectrum cephalosporins and aztreonam results from the susceptible to the resistant category without confirming the presence of an ESBL phenotype would lead to a large percentage of false resistance results and is not recommended. However, by increasing the cefpodoxime MIC screening breakpoint to >/=8 micro g/ml, 45% of the false-positive results could be eliminated. NCCLS has incorporated this change in the cefpodoxime screening breakpoint in its recent documents.
为确定是否有必要对大肠埃希菌中产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)进行确证试验,我们从ICARE(重症监护抗菌药物耐药性流行病学)项目菌株库中选取了131株符合美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)潜在产ESBL筛选标准的大肠埃希菌分离株。对所有131株分离株而言,至少一种超广谱头孢菌素的肉汤微量稀释(BMD)最低抑菌浓度(MIC)≥2μg/ml。131株中的21株(16%)确证试验呈阳性;即,在克拉维酸(CA)存在的情况下,头孢他啶或头孢噻肟的BMD MIC降低≥3个稀释倍数,或者在CA存在的情况下,头孢他啶或头孢噻肟纸片周围的纸片扩散法抑菌圈直径增加≥5mm。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)证实所有21株分离株均含有bla(TEM)、bla(SHV)和bla(OXA)基因中的至少一种,并且在等电聚焦(IEF)试验中,所有分离株均显示至少一条与TEM、SHV或OXA酶一致的β-内酰胺酶条带。在这21株分离株中,3株通过BMD对头孢噻肟显示CA效应,但纸片扩散法检测未显示。131株分离株中有59株(45%)仅对头孢泊肟敏感性降低(MIC = 2~4μg/ml),且均无ESBL确证试验阳性结果。根据ESBL筛选试验结果,这些被归类为假阳性。其余51株(39%)分离株的头孢泊肟MIC范围为16~>128μg/ml,其他超广谱头孢菌素的MIC变化很大。所有51株分离株的ESBL确证试验结果均为阴性。大多数显示IEF图谱与TEM和AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的产生一致,并且几个表型组的代表性分离株显示孔蛋白图谱有变化;这51株分离株被认为是真阴性。总之,按照当前NCCLS筛选标准被鉴定为潜在ESBL生产者的131株大肠埃希菌分离株中,只有16%被确认为ESBL生产者。因此,在未确证ESBL表型存在的情况下,将超广谱头孢菌素和氨曲南结果的解释从敏感改为耐药类别会导致很大比例的假耐药结果,不建议这样做。然而,通过将头孢泊肟MIC筛选断点提高到≥8μg/ml,可以消除45%的假阳性结果。NCCLS已在其最近的文件中纳入了头孢泊肟筛选断点的这一变化。