Moland E S, Sanders C C, Thomson K S
Center for Research in Anti-Infectives and Biotechnology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska 68178, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2575-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.9.2575-2579.1998.
Among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Klebsiella oxytoca, there is an ever-increasing prevalence of beta-lactamases that may confer resistance to newer beta-lactam antibiotics that is not detectable by conventional procedures. Therefore, 75 isolates of these species producing well-characterized beta-lactamases were studied using two MicroScan conventional microdilution panels, Gram Negative Urine MIC 7 (NU7) and Gram Negative MIC Plus 2 (N+2), to determine if results could be utilized to provide an accurate indication of beta-lactamase production in the absence of frank resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and aztreonam. The enzymes studied included Bush groups 1 (AmpC), 2b (TEM-1, TEM-2, and SHV-1), 2be (extended spectrum beta-lactamases [ESBLs] and K1), and 2br, alone and in various combinations. In tests with E. coli and K. pneumoniae and the NU7 panel, cefpodoxime MICs of >/=2 microg/ml were obtained only for isolates producing ESBLs or AmpC beta-lactamases. Cefoxitin MICs of >16 microg/ml were obtained for all strains producing AmpC beta-lactamase and only 1 of 33 strains producing ESBLs. For the N+2 panel, ceftazidime MICs of >/=4 microg/ml correctly identified 90% of ESBL producers and 100% of AmpC producers among isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Cefotetan MICs of >/= 8 microg/ml were obtained for seven of eight producers of AmpC beta-lactamase and no ESBL producers. For tests performed with either panel and isolates of K. oxytoca, MICs of ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftizoxime were elevated for strains producing ESBLs, while ceftriaxone and aztreonam MICs separated low-level K1 from high-level K1 producers within this species. These results suggest that microdilution panels can be used by clinical laboratories as an indicator of certain beta-lactamases that may produce hidden but clinically significant resistance among isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and K. oxytoca. Although it may not always be possible to differentiate between strains that produce ESBLs and those that produce AmpC, this differentiation is not critical since therapeutic options for patients infected with such organisms are similarly limited.
在大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和产酸克雷伯菌的临床分离株中,β-内酰胺酶的流行率不断上升,这些酶可能会使细菌对新型β-内酰胺类抗生素产生耐药性,而常规检测方法无法检测到这种耐药性。因此,我们使用两种MicroScan常规微量稀释板,即革兰阴性菌尿液MIC 7(NU7)和革兰阴性菌MIC Plus 2(N+2),对75株产生特征明确的β-内酰胺酶的这些菌种进行了研究,以确定在对超广谱头孢菌素和氨曲南无明显耐药的情况下,检测结果是否可用于准确指示β-内酰胺酶的产生情况。所研究的酶包括布什分类1组(AmpC)、2b组(TEM-1、TEM-2和SHV-1)、2be组(超广谱β-内酰胺酶[ESBLs]和K1)以及2br组,单独或组合存在。在对大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌以及NU7板的检测中,仅对于产生ESBLs或AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的分离株,头孢泊肟的MIC≥2μg/ml。对于所有产生AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的菌株以及33株产生ESBLs的菌株中的1株,头孢西丁的MIC>16μg/ml。对于N+2板,在大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的分离株中,头孢他啶的MIC≥4μg/ml能正确鉴定出90%的ESBL产生菌和100%的AmpC产生菌。对于8株产生AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的菌株中的7株,头孢替坦的MIC≥8μg/ml,而产生ESBLs的菌株中无一例如此。对于使用任一板对产酸克雷伯菌分离株进行的检测,产生ESBLs的菌株头孢他啶、头孢噻肟和头孢唑肟的MIC升高,而在该菌种中,头孢曲松和氨曲南的MIC可区分低水平K1产生菌和高水平K1产生菌。这些结果表明,临床实验室可使用微量稀释板作为某些β-内酰胺酶的指示物,这些酶可能在大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和产酸克雷伯菌的分离株中产生隐匿但具有临床意义的耐药性。虽然可能并非总能区分产生ESBLs的菌株和产生AmpC的菌株,但这种区分并不关键,因为感染此类细菌的患者的治疗选择同样有限。