Cheng Liang, Montironi Rodolfo, Davidson Darrell D, Lopez-Beltran Antonio
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 350 West 11th Street, Clarian Pathology Laboratory Room 4010, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2009 Jun;22 Suppl 2:S70-95. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.1.
Significant progress has been made in the standardization of bladder neoplasm classification and reporting. Accurate staging using the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM system is essential for patient management, and has been reinforced by clinical evidence in recent years. It is now recognized that 'superficial' bladder carcinomas are a heterogenous group of tumors with diverse biological and clinical manifestations. The term 'superficial,' therefore, is no longer used for bladder tumor nomenclature. Recognition of diagnostic pitfalls associated with lamina propria invasion is critical for the evaluation of bladder tumor specimens. Neither the 1973 nor the 2004 WHO grading system appears to be useful for predicting the clinical outcome of invasive urothelial carcinoma. This review will discuss recent progress and controversial issues on the staging and substaging of bladder carcinomas. Essential elements for handling and reporting of bladder tumor specimens will also be discussed.
膀胱肿瘤分类和报告的标准化已取得显著进展。使用美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟(AJCC/UICC)TNM系统进行准确分期对患者管理至关重要,并且近年来已得到临床证据的强化。现在人们认识到,“浅表性”膀胱癌是一组具有不同生物学和临床表现的异质性肿瘤。因此,“浅表性”一词不再用于膀胱肿瘤的命名。认识到与固有层浸润相关的诊断陷阱对于评估膀胱肿瘤标本至关重要。1973年和2004年的世界卫生组织分级系统似乎都无助于预测浸润性尿路上皮癌的临床结局。本综述将讨论膀胱癌分期和亚分期方面的最新进展和争议问题。还将讨论处理和报告膀胱肿瘤标本的基本要素。