Hensel Brian K, Parker-Oliver Debra, Demiris George, Rantz Marilyn
The Atlantic Philanthropies, 1600 16th Street NW #209, Washington, DC 2009, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Jun;10(5):342-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.02.006.
To explore user perceptions of videophone communication in different long-term care settings by comparing interview transcripts of a study involving residents of a congregate living facility (CLF) and family members with findings of a case study involving a resident of a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and family member.
Semistructured interviews by telephone and in person were conducted with residents and family members, with both studies using an interview guide with similar questions.
All themes found in the SNF study were also identified in the CLF data. There was consistency between studies in preferences for videophones (over telephones) for affective-oriented conversations and perceptions of acceptable usability. Both yielded generally acceptable technical quality, although 2 of 8 CLU participants' concerns were likely barriers to adoption.
Consistency in findings lends validity to the earlier SNF findings and suggests some degree of reliability across these settings. Additional insights were gained in the CLF study, a new context in the resident-family videophone communication literature. The theoretical framework of social presence and communication bandwidth holds promise as applied, but further explication and operationalization are needed.
通过比较一项涉及集体生活设施(CLF)居民和家庭成员的研究的访谈记录与一项涉及熟练护理设施(SNF)居民和家庭成员的案例研究结果,探讨用户在不同长期护理环境中对可视电话通信的看法。
通过电话和面对面方式对居民和家庭成员进行半结构化访谈,两项研究均使用具有相似问题的访谈指南。
SNF研究中发现的所有主题在CLF数据中也都被识别出来。两项研究在情感导向对话中对可视电话(相对于电话)的偏好以及对可接受可用性的看法上具有一致性。两者的技术质量总体上都可以接受,尽管8名CLU参与者中有2人的担忧可能是采用的障碍。
研究结果的一致性为早期SNF研究结果提供了有效性,并表明在这些环境中具有一定程度的可靠性。在CLF研究中获得了更多见解,这是居民 - 家庭可视电话通信文献中的一个新背景。社会临场感和通信带宽的理论框架在应用中具有前景,但需要进一步阐述和实施。