McIntosh Emma, Barlow Jane, Davis Hilton, Stewart-Brown Sarah
Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, Oxford, UK.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2009 Sep;31(3):423-33. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp047. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
Recent reviews have shown that home visiting programmes that address parenting have the potential to improve long term health and social outcomes for children. However there are few studies exploring the cost-effectiveness of such interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an intensive home visiting programme directed at vulnerable families during the antenatal and postnatal periods.
The design was an economic evaluation alongside a multicentre randomized controlled trial, in which 131 eligible women were randomly allocated to receive 18 months of intensive home visiting (n=67) or standard services (n=64). Due to the public health nature of the intervention a cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken from a societal perspective.
The mean 'societal costs' in the control and intervention arms were 3874 pounds and 7120 pounds, respectively, a difference of 3246 pounds (p<0.000). The mean 'health service only' costs were 3324 pounds and 5685 pounds respectively, a difference of 2361 pounds (p<0.000). As well as significant improvements in maternal sensitivity and infant cooperativeness there was also a non-significant increase in the likelihood of the intervention group infants being removed from the home due to abuse and neglect. These incremental benefits were delivered at an incremental societal cost of 3246 pounds per woman.
The results of the study provide evidence to suggest that, within the context of regular home visits, specially trained home visitors can increase maternal sensitivity and infant cooperativeness and are better able to identify infants in need of removal from the home for child protection. The extent to which these benefits are 'worth' the societal cost of 3246 pounds per woman however is a matter of judgment.
近期综述表明,针对育儿问题的家访项目有潜力改善儿童的长期健康和社会状况。然而,很少有研究探讨此类干预措施的成本效益。本研究的目的是评估一项在产前和产后针对弱势家庭的强化家访项目的成本效益。
该设计是一项经济评估,同时进行多中心随机对照试验,131名符合条件的女性被随机分配接受18个月的强化家访(n = 67)或标准服务(n = 64)。由于干预措施具有公共卫生性质,因此从社会角度进行了成本效益分析。
对照组和干预组的平均“社会成本”分别为3874英镑和7120英镑,相差3246英镑(p < 0.000)。仅医疗服务的平均成本分别为3324英镑和5685英镑,相差2361英镑(p < 0.000)。除了母亲的敏感性和婴儿的合作性有显著改善外,干预组婴儿因虐待和忽视而被带离家庭的可能性也有非显著增加。这些额外的益处是以每位女性3246英镑的额外社会成本实现的。
研究结果表明,在定期家访的背景下,经过专门培训的家访人员可以提高母亲的敏感性和婴儿的合作性,并且更有能力识别需要为保护儿童而带离家庭的婴儿。然而,这些益处是否“值”每位女性3246英镑的社会成本,这是一个判断问题。