Pilch U, Wozniewski M, Szuba A
Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Physical Education, Wroclaw, Poland.
Lymphology. 2009 Mar;42(1):26-35.
The cycle time and number of chambers in the pneumatic sleeve may influence the outcome of lymphedema therapy with intermittent compression devices. The aim of our study was to assess efficacy of several commonly used different IPC protocols on edema volume reduction in women with postmastectomy lymphedema. Fixty-seven (57) women with secondary arm lymphedema (age 39-80) were selected to the study. Women were randomly assigned to two study groups with different IPC cycle times: I--90:90s and II--45:15s. Both groups were then randomly divided into two subgroups with different sleeves: A--1 chamber sleeve (28 women) and B--3 chamber sleeve (29 women). All women underwent IPC treatment for 5 weeks, 5 times a week for 1 hour (25 sessions). Arm volume measurements were performed before and after each IPC session. Significant reduction of edema volume was observed in all therapeutic subgroups, regardless of cycle times and number of chambers. In the group with short IPC cycle, better efficacy was noticed with 3-chamber sleeve. IPC is an effective method of volume reduction in women with postmastectomy arm lymphedema regardless of cycle times and number of sleeve chambers.
气动袖带的循环时间和腔室数量可能会影响间歇性压迫装置治疗淋巴水肿的效果。我们研究的目的是评估几种常用的不同间歇性压迫疗法(IPC)方案对乳腺癌切除术后淋巴水肿女性患者水肿体积减少的疗效。选取了67名(57名)继发性手臂淋巴水肿女性(年龄39 - 80岁)参与研究。将女性患者随机分为两组,采用不同的IPC循环时间:I组——90:90秒,II组——45:15秒。然后,两组再随机分为两个亚组,使用不同的袖带:A组——单腔袖带(28名女性)和B组——三腔袖带(29名女性)。所有女性均接受5周的IPC治疗,每周5次,每次1小时(共25次治疗)。在每次IPC治疗前后均进行手臂体积测量。无论循环时间和腔室数量如何,所有治疗亚组的水肿体积均显著减少。在IPC循环时间短的组中,三腔袖带的疗效更佳。无论循环时间和袖带腔室数量如何,IPC都是减少乳腺癌切除术后手臂淋巴水肿女性患者体积的有效方法。