Shawki Sherief, Belizon Avraham, Person Benjamin, Weiss Eric G, Sands Dana R, Wexner Steven D
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida 33331, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 May;52(5):884-90. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819eef8f.
Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the current surgical treatment of choice for most patients with ulcerative colitis. Complications of the ileal pouch may necessitate additional operations to salvage the pouch. The aims of this study were to review the outcomes of reoperative restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery and to define any predictors of successful pouch salvage surgery.
The medical records of all patients who underwent reoperative ileoanal pouch surgery for either pouch salvage or pouch excision between 1988 and 2007 were reviewed. Successful ileoanal pouch salvage was considered to be an intact functioning pouch, after resolution of problem, with a follow-up of at least six months and good to excellent patient satisfaction and continence.
Fifty-one patients underwent reoperation for pouch-related complications (44 mucosal ulcerative colitis, 6 familial adenomatous polyposis, and 1 indeterminate colitis), in addition to 8 patients with Crohn's disease. An additional 17 patients had primary pouch excision. Thirty-eight (74.4 percent) of the 51 patients who underwent pouch salvage had a successful outcome. Twenty-three patients had pouch reconstruction or revision via an abdominal approach with a 69.5 percent success rate. The remainder of patients had local perineal procedures for control of perianal sepsis, with 75 percent success rate. Patients required a mean of 2.1 procedures to achieve pouch salvage; there was no correlation between the number of ileoanal pouch salvage procedures and failure. Crohn's disease was ultimately diagnosed in more than half of the patients who underwent primary pouch excision. Among the patients with Crohn's disease who underwent pouch salvage only three retained their pouches, for a success rate of only 37 percent.
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis salvage surgery can save a considerable number of patients from pouch excision and permanent ileostomy. Both local perineal and abdominal approaches yield acceptable results. The choice of procedure is based on the etiology and anatomy of the problem and the surgeon's preference and patient-related factors such as diagnosis.
全结直肠切除回肠贮袋肛管吻合术是目前大多数溃疡性结肠炎患者的手术治疗选择。回肠贮袋的并发症可能需要额外的手术来挽救贮袋。本研究的目的是回顾再次手术的全结直肠切除回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的结果,并确定贮袋挽救手术成功的预测因素。
回顾了1988年至2007年间所有因贮袋挽救或贮袋切除而接受再次回肠肛管贮袋手术的患者的病历。成功的回肠肛管贮袋挽救被认为是在问题解决后,贮袋功能完好,随访至少6个月,患者满意度和控便能力良好至优秀。
51例患者因贮袋相关并发症接受再次手术(44例为黏膜性溃疡性结肠炎,6例为家族性腺瘤性息肉病,1例为不确定性结肠炎),此外还有8例克罗恩病患者。另有17例患者进行了原发性贮袋切除。51例接受贮袋挽救的患者中有38例(74.4%)获得了成功的结果。23例患者通过腹部入路进行了贮袋重建或修复,成功率为69.5%。其余患者进行了局部会阴手术以控制肛周感染,成功率为75%。患者平均需要2.1次手术才能实现贮袋挽救;回肠肛管贮袋挽救手术的次数与失败之间没有相关性。超过一半接受原发性贮袋切除的患者最终被诊断为克罗恩病。在接受贮袋挽救的克罗恩病患者中,只有3例保留了贮袋,成功率仅为37%。
回肠肛管吻合术挽救手术可以使相当数量的患者避免贮袋切除和永久性回肠造口术。局部会阴和腹部入路均能取得可接受的结果。手术方式的选择基于问题的病因和解剖结构以及外科医生的偏好和患者相关因素,如诊断。