Oliveira Denoel Marcelino de, Gomes Eros Silva, Mussivand Tofy, Fiorelli Alfredo Inácio, Gomes Otoni Moreira
São Francisco de Assis Cardiovascular Foundation/ServCor - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009 Jan-Mar;24(1):23-30. doi: 10.1590/s0102-76382009000100006.
The aim of this study is to assess if N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) changes the Ischemic Preconditioning (IP) in isolated rat hearts using only one cycle of IP.
Heart Rate (HR), Coronary Flow (CF) and Myocardial Contractility (dP/dt) were registered in 30 Wistar rat's hearts. After anesthesia the hearts were removed and perfused with Krebes-Hensleit equilibrated solution with 95% of O2 and 5% of CO2 according Langendorff's method. GI: Control (n=6); GII: 20 min. ischemia (n=6); GIII: IP (n=6); GIV 50 microg/ml/min NAC before IP (n =6); GV: 100 microg/ ml/min NAC before IP (n=6). Parameters were measured after 15 min. of stabilization (T 0) and T3, T5, T10, T15, T20, T25 and T30 min. after reperfusion. Statistical significance was considered when P<0.05.
There were changes on HR comparing GI with GII at T20 and T25 and comparing GI with GIII, GIV with GV at T10 and T20 (P<0.05). CF was different comparing GI with GII at T3 and T5, GI with GIV at T10 and GI with GV at T10 and T25 (P<0.05). Myocardial Contractility was similar comparing GIII with GI and GV. GIII had higher dP/dt than GIV but without statistical difference (P>0.05). dP/dt was higher in GV than GIV but with statistically significant difference only at T30.
dP/dt was better in preconditioned hearts and was changed if using NAC in GIV. The use of NAC didn't change the effects of preconditioning on myocardial contractility in GV.
本研究旨在评估仅使用一个缺血预处理(IP)周期时,N - 乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)是否会改变离体大鼠心脏的缺血预处理。
记录30只Wistar大鼠心脏的心率(HR)、冠状动脉血流量(CF)和心肌收缩力(dP/dt)。麻醉后取出心脏,按照Langendorff法用含95% O₂和5% CO₂的Krebes - Hensleit平衡溶液进行灌注。第一组(GI):对照组(n = 6);第二组(GII):20分钟缺血组(n = 6);第三组(GIII):缺血预处理组(n = 6);第四组(GIV):缺血预处理前给予50微克/毫升/分钟NAC组(n = 6);第五组(GV):缺血预处理前给予100微克/毫升/分钟NAC组(n = 6)。在稳定15分钟(T0)后以及再灌注后第3、5、10、15、20、25和30分钟测量各项参数。当P < 0.05时认为具有统计学意义。
在T20和T25时,GI与GII比较HR有变化;在T10和T20时,GI与GIII、GIV与GV比较HR有变化(P < 0.05)。在T3和T5时,GI与GII比较CF有差异;在T10时,GI与GIV比较CF有差异;在T10和T25时,GI与GV比较CF有差异(P < 0.05)。GIII与GI和GV比较,心肌收缩力相似。GIII的dP/dt高于GIV,但无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。GV的dP/dt高于GIV,但仅在T30时有统计学显著差异。
预处理心脏的dP/dt较好,且在GIV组中使用NAC时会发生改变。在GV组中使用NAC并未改变预处理对心肌收缩力的影响。