Suppr超能文献

验证饮食障碍量表(EDI-2)在两个丹麦样本中的有效性:饮食障碍患者女性与普通人群女性的比较。

Validating the eating disorder inventory (EDI-2) in two Danish samples: a comparison between female eating disorder patients and females from the general population.

机构信息

Eating Disorder Centre, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2009 Nov;17(6):462-7. doi: 10.1002/erv.945.

Abstract

The Eating Disorder Inventory, Version 2 (EDI-2) is a questionnaire used clinically and in research all over the world. EDI-2 is cross-culturally valid, yet normative values may depend on culture. Norms and reliability of the Danish version have to date been lacking, and will be presented in this article, comparing patients (N = 575) and controls (N = 881). Also, internal reliability of scales is tested for both groups. Differences between norms of the Danish and the North American version of EDI were small but significant for all scales except asceticism (eating disorder patients) and ineffectiveness, interpersonal distrust and maturity fears (normal controls). For both groups the internal consistency was >0.70 for all subscales except asceticism. Although differences across the eating disorder diagnostic groups were dubious, the EDI-2 is useful to screen for eating problems in the general population as well as to rate progress and outcome among eating disorder patients.

摘要

饮食障碍量表 2 版(EDI-2)是一种在全球范围内被临床和研究广泛使用的问卷。EDI-2 具有跨文化的有效性,但常模值可能取决于文化。丹麦版的常模和信度迄今为止一直缺乏,本文将对患者(N=575)和对照组(N=881)进行比较,并呈现出来。此外,还对两组的量表内部信度进行了测试。丹麦版和北美版 EDI 的常模差异很小,但除了禁欲(饮食障碍患者)和无效、人际不信任和成熟恐惧(正常对照组)外,所有量表的差异均具有统计学意义。对于两组来说,除了禁欲之外,所有分量表的内部一致性均>0.70。尽管跨饮食障碍诊断组的差异值得怀疑,但 EDI-2 可用于筛查一般人群中的饮食问题,以及评估饮食障碍患者的治疗进展和结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验