Martinelli Mary K, Schreyer Colleen C, Vanzhula Irina A, Guarda Angela S
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 20;15:1325252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1325252. eCollection 2024.
Eating disorders (EDs) are conceptualized as disorders of under- and over-control, with impulsivity reflecting under-control. Extant research indicates that impulsivity and related factors such as reward sensitivity and punishment sensitivity may serve as trait-level transdiagnostic risk and/or maintenance factors in EDs. Findings on impulsivity and reward and punishment sensitivity by diagnosis are mixed and research on the relationship between these factors and ED symptoms, hospital course, and treatment outcomes is limited.
Participants ( = 228) were patients admitted to a specialized inpatient behavioral treatment program for EDs who agreed to participate in a longitudinal study and completed self-report measures of impulsivity, reward sensitivity, and punishment sensitivity at admission. Weight and ED symptomatology were measured at admission and discharge. Hospital course variables included length of stay and premature treatment dropout.
Impulsivity was lower in individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) restricting type compared to those with AN binge/purge type or bulimia nervosa; no other group differences were observed. Higher impulsivity was associated with greater bulimic symptoms on the Eating Disorder Inventory 2 (EDI-2) at admission. Impulsivity was not related to ED symptoms, weight outcomes, length of hospital stay, or treatment dropout at program discharge.
Impulsivity may help distinguish restrictive versus binge/purge EDs, but does not necessarily relate to discharge outcomes in an intensive inpatient ED program. Findings from this study provide novel contributions to the literature on personality traits in EDs and have important clinical implications. Results suggest that patients with higher levels of impulsivity or reward and punishment sensitivity can be expected to respond to inpatient treatment. Suggestions for future research are discussed.
饮食失调被概念化为控制不足和过度控制的紊乱,冲动性反映了控制不足。现有研究表明,冲动性以及诸如奖励敏感性和惩罚敏感性等相关因素可能作为饮食失调的特质水平跨诊断风险和/或维持因素。关于按诊断分类的冲动性以及奖励和惩罚敏感性的研究结果参差不齐,并且关于这些因素与饮食失调症状、住院过程及治疗结果之间关系的研究有限。
参与者(n = 228)为入住专门的饮食失调住院行为治疗项目的患者,他们同意参与一项纵向研究,并在入院时完成了冲动性、奖励敏感性和惩罚敏感性的自我报告测量。在入院和出院时测量体重和饮食失调症状。住院过程变量包括住院时间和过早退出治疗。
与神经性厌食症(AN)暴食/清除型或神经性贪食症患者相比,AN限制型患者的冲动性较低;未观察到其他组间差异。入院时,较高的冲动性与饮食失调问卷2(EDI - 2)上更严重的贪食症状相关。冲动性与饮食失调症状、体重结果、住院时间或项目出院时的治疗退出无关。
冲动性可能有助于区分限制型与暴食/清除型饮食失调,但不一定与强化住院饮食失调项目的出院结果相关。本研究结果为饮食失调人格特质的文献提供了新的贡献,并具有重要的临床意义。结果表明,预计冲动性或奖励和惩罚敏感性水平较高的患者对住院治疗有反应。讨论了对未来研究的建议。