Suppr超能文献

人体双交叉相对效价镇痛试验。I. 吗啡与吗啡对比。

Twin crossover relative potency analgesic assays in man. I. Morphine vs. morphine.

作者信息

Beaver W T, Feise G A

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1977 Aug-Sep;17(8-9):461-79. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1977.tb05639.x.

Abstract

Although the four-point relative potency assay using crossover design has proven a powerful technique for the clinical evaluation of analgesics in patients with chronic pain, excessive dropouts have made this design impractical in postoperative pain. In a relative potency assay comparing single graded intramuscular doses of morphine standard and morphine test in postoperative patients, we have managed to circumvent this difficulty while preserving many of the advantages of a complete crossover by using the "twin-crossover" balanced incomplete block design, which requires that each subject receive only two of the four possible treatments. The "twin crossover" design, coupled with a sequential decision-making process that expedites choosing the doses of the test medication which are most closely equianalgesic with the standard, yielded excellent analgesic assay sensitivity and made efficient use of our population of postoperative patients.

摘要

尽管采用交叉设计的四点相对效价测定法已被证明是用于慢性疼痛患者镇痛药临床评估的一项有力技术,但过多的失访使得该设计在术后疼痛评估中不切实际。在一项比较术后患者单次分级肌内注射吗啡标准品和吗啡测试品的相对效价测定中,我们设法克服了这一困难,同时通过使用“双交叉”平衡不完全区组设计保留了完全交叉设计的许多优点,该设计要求每个受试者仅接受四种可能治疗中的两种。“双交叉”设计,再加上一个加快选择与标准品镇痛效果最接近等效剂量的测试药物的序贯决策过程,产生了出色的镇痛测定灵敏度,并有效利用了我们的术后患者群体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验