Dionne R A, Wirdezk P R, Butler D P, Fox P C
Anesth Prog. 1984 Mar-Apr;31(2):77-81.
The analgesic efficacy of two doses of conorphone (20 and 40 mg), a mixed agonist-antagonist analgesic, were compared to two doses of codeine for postoperative pain in the oral surgery model. Each subject received 2 of the 4 possible treatment at two separate sessions in an incomplete block, single crossover design. Both doses of conorphone and the 60 mg dose of codeine were superior to 30 mg of codeine for the various indices of analgesic activity. The 40 mg dose of conorphone resulted in a high incidence of side effects (25/30 subjects) such as drowsiness, dizziness, nausea and vomiting. The low dose of conorphone resulted in side effects similar to 60 mg of codeine with the exception of a greater incidence of drowsiness. These data suggest that while 40 mg of conorphone may not be well tolerated clinically, 20 mg of conorphone may be an alternative to 60 mg of codeine for postoperative pain.
在口腔手术模型中,将两种剂量的混合激动剂-拮抗剂镇痛药可诺啡(20毫克和40毫克)的镇痛效果与两种剂量的可待因用于术后疼痛的效果进行了比较。在不完全区组单交叉设计中,每个受试者在两个不同的疗程中接受4种可能治疗中的2种。可诺啡的两种剂量以及60毫克剂量的可待因在各种镇痛活性指标上均优于30毫克剂量的可待因。40毫克剂量的可诺啡导致副作用发生率较高(25/30名受试者),如嗜睡、头晕、恶心和呕吐。低剂量的可诺啡导致的副作用与60毫克剂量的可待因相似,但嗜睡发生率更高。这些数据表明,虽然40毫克的可诺啡在临床上可能耐受性不佳,但20毫克的可诺啡可能是术后疼痛时替代60毫克可待因的一种选择。