Queens Medical Centre, School of Nursing, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK.
Glob Public Health. 2010;5(5):449-61. doi: 10.1080/17441690902942472.
Increasing emphasis is being placed on the need for 'structural interventions' (SIs) in HIV prevention internationally. There is great variation in how the concept of SI is defined and operationalised, however, and this has potentially problematic implications for their likely success. In this paper, we clarify and elucidate what constitutes a SI with particular reference to the structured distribution of power and to the role of communities. We summarise the background to the growing emphasis being placed on the concept of SIs in HIV prevention policy, and present ethnographic case-study material from a sex worker's HIV project in Kolkata, India, to illustrate the nature of HIV vulnerability and its implications for the design and targeting of successful SIs. The paper draws attention to the dual importance of (1) attending to local complexities in the micro and macro-level structures that produce vulnerability; and (2) clarifying the meaning and role of communities within SIs.
目前,国际上越来越重视在艾滋病预防方面采取“结构性干预”(Structural Interventions,SIs)。然而,对于 SIs 的概念如何定义和实施存在很大差异,这可能对其成功产生潜在的问题。在本文中,我们特别参考权力的结构性分配和社区的作用,阐明和阐明了什么构成 SIs。我们总结了在艾滋病预防政策中越来越强调 SIs 这一概念的背景,并呈现了来自印度加尔各答性工作者艾滋病项目的民族志案例研究材料,以说明艾滋病脆弱性的性质及其对成功 SIs 的设计和目标的影响。本文提请注意(1)关注微观和宏观层面结构中产生脆弱性的本地复杂性;(2)澄清 SIs 中社区的含义和作用这两个方面的双重重要性。