Arleen F. Brown is with General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Grace X. Ma is with Center for Asian Health, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. Jeanne Miranda is with the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA. Eugenia Eng is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dorothy Castille is with the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Teresa Brockie is with Community Public Health Nursing, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Center for American Indian Health, Baltimore, MD. Patricia Jones is with Division of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health. Collins O. Airhihenbuwa is with Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, Global Research Against Noncommunicable Diseases, Georgia State School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA. Tilda Farhat is with the Office of Science Policy, Planning, Analysis, Reporting and Data; National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Lin Zhu is with the Center for Asian Health, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University. Chau Trinh-Shevrin is with the Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. Tilda Farhat is also a Guest Editor for this supplement issue.
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S72-S78. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304844.
Health disparities research in the United States over the past 2 decades has yielded considerable progress and contributed to a developing evidence base for interventions that tackle disparities in health status and access to care. However, health disparity interventions have focused primarily on individual and interpersonal factors, which are often limited in their ability to yield sustained improvements. Health disparities emerge and persist through complex mechanisms that include socioeconomic, environmental, and system-level factors. To accelerate the reduction of health disparities and yield enduring health outcomes requires broader approaches that intervene upon these structural determinants. Although an increasing number of innovative programs and policies have been deployed to address structural determinants, few explicitly focused on their impact on minority health and health disparities. Rigorously evaluated, evidence-based structural interventions are needed to address multilevel structural determinants that systemically lead to and perpetuate social and health inequities. This article highlights examples of structural interventions that have yielded health benefits, discusses challenges and opportunities for accelerating improvements in minority health, and proposes recommendations to foster the development of structural interventions likely to advance health disparities research.
在过去的 20 年中,美国在健康差异研究方面取得了相当大的进展,并为解决健康状况和获得医疗服务方面的差异的干预措施提供了不断发展的证据基础。然而,健康差异干预措施主要集中在个人和人际因素上,这些因素往往在持续改善方面能力有限。健康差异是通过包括社会经济、环境和系统层面因素在内的复杂机制出现并持续存在的。要加快减少健康差异并产生持久的健康结果,需要采取更广泛的方法来干预这些结构性决定因素。尽管已经部署了越来越多的创新方案和政策来解决结构性决定因素,但很少有方案明确关注其对少数民族健康和健康差异的影响。需要经过严格评估的循证结构性干预措施来解决导致和延续社会和健康不平等的多层次结构性决定因素。本文重点介绍了一些已产生健康效益的结构性干预措施,讨论了加速改善少数民族健康的挑战和机遇,并提出了促进可能推进健康差异研究的结构性干预措施发展的建议。