• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估姑息治疗中的家庭:家庭关系能力清单的一项试点研究。

Assessing families in palliative care: a pilot study of the checklist of family relational abilities.

作者信息

Wilkins Victoria M, Quill Timothy E, King Deborah A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, White Plains, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2009 Jun;12(6):517-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0021.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2009.0021
PMID:19508136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2904190/
Abstract

Although families often play an integral role in palliative care, there are currently few measures to help clinicians gauge families' abilities to participate in this process. The Checklist of Family Relational Abilities was developed as an efficient, clinician-rated method of family assessment. Preliminary results suggest that Checklist ratings of overall family functioning and strength of family attachments were reliable across raters and associated with a well-validated self-report measure of family functioning. However, ratings of family communication and collaborative decision-making were less reliable. Based on these preliminary findings, we propose a revised version of the Checklist for further study in palliative care settings.

摘要

尽管家庭在姑息治疗中常常发挥不可或缺的作用,但目前几乎没有措施来帮助临床医生评估家庭参与这一过程的能力。家庭关系能力清单是作为一种高效的、由临床医生评定的家庭评估方法而制定的。初步结果表明,家庭整体功能和家庭依恋强度的清单评分在不同评定者之间是可靠的,并且与一种经过充分验证的家庭功能自我报告测量方法相关。然而,家庭沟通和共同决策的评分可靠性较低。基于这些初步发现,我们提出了该清单的修订版,以供在姑息治疗环境中进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Assessing families in palliative care: a pilot study of the checklist of family relational abilities.评估姑息治疗中的家庭:家庭关系能力清单的一项试点研究。
J Palliat Med. 2009 Jun;12(6):517-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0021.
2
Palliative care: views of patients and their families.姑息治疗:患者及其家属的观点。
BMJ. 1990 Aug 4;301(6746):277-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6746.277.
3
Working with families in palliative care: one size does not fit all.在姑息治疗中与家庭合作:一刀切并不适用。
J Palliat Med. 2006 Jun;9(3):704-15. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.704.
4
Smartphone-Enabled, Telehealth-Based Family Conferences in Palliative Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Pilot Observational Study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,基于智能手机的远程医疗的姑息治疗中的家庭会议:试点观察研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 28;8(10):e22069. doi: 10.2196/22069.
5
Family members' perceptions of inpatient palliative care consult services: a qualitative study.家庭成员对住院姑息治疗咨询服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):42-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216313491620. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
6
A pilot evaluation of the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long-Term Care (SPA-LTC) program.长期护理中强化舒缓治疗方法(SPA-LTC)项目的初步评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 13;19(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00599-w.
7
Shared Decision-Making in Palliative Care: A Maternalistic Approach.姑息治疗中的共享决策:一种家长主义方法。
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2021;11(2):211-220. doi: 10.1353/nib.2021.0072.
8
Family member satisfaction with end-of-life decision making in the ICU.家庭成员对重症监护病房临终决策的满意度。
Chest. 2008 Mar;133(3):704-12. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1773. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
9
Improving comfort and communication in the ICU: a practical new tool for palliative care performance measurement and feedback.改善重症监护病房的舒适度与沟通:一种用于姑息治疗绩效评估与反馈的实用新工具。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Aug;15(4):264-71. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017707.
10
Family discord and proxy decision makers' end-of-life treatment decisions.家庭不和与代理决策者的临终治疗决策
J Palliat Med. 2008 Oct;11(8):1109-14. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0039.

本文引用的文献

1
Working with families in palliative care: one size does not fit all.在姑息治疗中与家庭合作:一刀切并不适用。
J Palliat Med. 2006 Jun;9(3):704-15. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.704.
2
The role of the family in resolving bioethical dilemmas: clinical insights from a family systems perspective.家庭在解决生物伦理困境中的作用:从家庭系统视角获得的临床见解
J Clin Ethics. 2004 Summer;15(2):123-34; discussion 135-8.
3
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
4
Family matters: a social system perspective on physician-assisted suicide and the older adult.家庭事务:从社会系统视角看医生协助自杀与老年人
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2000 Jun;6(2):434-51.
5
Family reports of barriers to optimal care of the dying.关于临终患者获得最佳护理存在障碍的家庭报告。
Nurs Res. 2000 Nov-Dec;49(6):310-7. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200011000-00003.
6
Depression without sadness: alternative presentations of depression in late life.无悲伤的抑郁症:老年期抑郁症的另类表现
Am Fam Physician. 1999 Sep 1;60(3):820-6.
7
The Melbourne Family Grief Study, II: Psychosocial morbidity and grief in bereaved families.墨尔本家庭悲伤研究,II:丧亲家庭中的心理社会发病率与悲伤
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 May;153(5):659-66. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.5.659.
8
The Melbourne Family Grief Study, I: Perceptions of family functioning in bereavement.墨尔本家庭悲伤研究,I:丧亲之痛中对家庭功能的认知。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 May;153(5):650-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.5.650.
9
The epigenesis of relational systems: a model for understanding family development.关系系统的表观遗传学:一种理解家庭发展的模型。
Fam Process. 1984 Sep;23(3):297-318. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00297.x.