• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种最优治疗方案可归因益处的广义估计量。

A generalized estimator of the attributable benefit of an optimal treatment regime.

作者信息

Brinkley Jason, Tsiatis Anastasios, Anstrom Kevin J

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27834, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2010 Jun;66(2):512-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01282.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01282.x
PMID:19508237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2891886/
Abstract

For many diseases where there are several treatment options often there is no consensus on the best treatment to give individual patients. In such cases, it may be necessary to define a strategy for treatment assignment; that is, an algorithm that dictates the treatment an individual should receive based on their measured characteristics. Such a strategy or algorithm is also referred to as a treatment regime. The optimal treatment regime is the strategy that would provide the most public health benefit by minimizing as many poor outcomes as possible. Using a measure that is a generalization of attributable risk (AR) and notions of potential outcomes, we derive an estimator for the proportion of events that could have been prevented had the optimal treatment regime been implemented. Traditional AR studies look at the added risk that can be attributed to exposure of some contaminant; here we will instead study the benefit that can be attributed to using the optimal treatment strategy. We will show how regression models can be used to estimate the optimal treatment strategy and the attributable benefit of that strategy. We also derive the large sample properties of this estimator. As a motivating example, we will apply our methods to an observational study of 3856 patients treated at the Duke University Medical Center with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery and further heart-related problems requiring a catheterization. The patients may be treated with either medical therapy alone or a combination of medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention without a general consensus on which is the best treatment for individual patients.

摘要

对于许多存在多种治疗选择的疾病,对于给个体患者提供最佳治疗方法往往没有共识。在这种情况下,可能有必要定义一种治疗分配策略;也就是说,一种根据个体测量特征来决定其应接受何种治疗的算法。这样的策略或算法也被称为治疗方案。最优治疗方案是通过尽可能减少不良结局来提供最大公共卫生效益的策略。使用一种可归因风险(AR)的广义度量和潜在结果的概念,我们推导出一个估计值,用于估计如果实施最优治疗方案原本可以预防的事件比例。传统的AR研究关注可归因于某种污染物暴露的额外风险;在这里,我们将转而研究可归因于使用最优治疗策略的益处。我们将展示如何使用回归模型来估计最优治疗策略及其该策略的可归因益处。我们还推导出了这个估计值的大样本性质。作为一个激励性示例,我们将把我们的方法应用于一项对3856名在杜克大学医学中心接受过冠状动脉搭桥手术且因进一步的心脏相关问题需要进行导管插入术的患者的观察性研究。这些患者可以单独接受药物治疗,也可以接受药物治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的联合治疗,对于个体患者哪种是最佳治疗方法并没有普遍共识。

相似文献

1
A generalized estimator of the attributable benefit of an optimal treatment regime.一种最优治疗方案可归因益处的广义估计量。
Biometrics. 2010 Jun;66(2):512-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01282.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
2
A doubly robust estimator for the attributable benefit of a treatment regime.一种用于治疗方案可归因益处的双重稳健估计量。
Stat Med. 2014 Dec 20;33(29):5057-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.6312. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
3
Optimal treatment regimes for survival endpoints using a locally-efficient doubly-robust estimator from a classification perspective.从分类角度使用局部有效双稳健估计量的生存终点最优治疗方案。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2017 Oct;23(4):585-604. doi: 10.1007/s10985-016-9376-x. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.冠状动脉血运重建的现状:冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Sep;26(9):919-933. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02090-x. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
6
Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy on long-term outcome in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (a 25-year experience from the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Databank).缺血性心肌病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物治疗对长期预后的比较(来自杜克心血管疾病数据库的25年经验)
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jul 15;90(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02429-3.
7
Pool adjacent violators algorithm-assisted learning with application on estimating optimal individualized treatment regimes.合并相邻违规者算法辅助学习及其在估计最优个体化治疗方案中的应用
Biometrics. 2022 Dec;78(4):1475-1488. doi: 10.1111/biom.13511. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
8
Initial strategy of revascularization versus optimal medical therapy for improving outcomes in ischemic heart disease: a review of the literature.初始血运重建策略与最佳药物治疗改善缺血性心脏病结局的比较:文献复习。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012 Aug;14(4):397-407. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0278-6.
9
Optimal medical therapy improves clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial at the 5-year follow-up.最优药物治疗可改善经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建患者的临床结局:来自经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与紫杉醇洗脱支架和心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的 5 年随访结果。
Circulation. 2015 Apr 7;131(14):1269-77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013042. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
10
Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty.冠状动脉疾病治疗方法的持续演变。冠状动脉成形术时代的初步结果。
Circulation. 1994 May;89(5):2015-25. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.5.2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonparametric Biomarker Based Treatment Selection With Reproducibility Data.基于非参数生物标志物的具有可重复性数据的治疗选择。
Stat Med. 2024 Nov 30;43(27):5077-5087. doi: 10.1002/sim.10218. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Personalized Medicine With Software.利用软件评估个性化医疗的有效性。
Front Big Data. 2021 May 18;4:572532. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.572532. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluating biomarkers for treatment selection from reproducibility studies.从可重复性研究中评估用于治疗选择的生物标志物。
Biostatistics. 2022 Jan 13;23(1):173-188. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa018.
4
Robustifying Trial-Derived Optimal Treatment Rules for A Target Population.强化针对目标人群的试验衍生最优治疗规则
Electron J Stat. 2019;13(1):1717-1743. doi: 10.1214/19-EJS1540. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Value-based and benefit-based strategies in deciding to bring a test into use should be distinguished.在决定采用一项检测时,基于价值和基于效益的策略应加以区分。
Diagn Progn Res. 2017 Feb 8;1:4. doi: 10.1186/s41512-016-0003-9. eCollection 2017.
6
Development and evaluating multimarker models for guiding treatment decisions.开发和评估多标志物模型以指导治疗决策。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0619-5.
7
Evaluation of biomarkers for treatment selection using individual participant data from multiple clinical trials.基于多个临床试验的个体参与者数据评估治疗选择的生物标志物。
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 30;37(9):1439-1453. doi: 10.1002/sim.7608. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
8
On Enrichment Strategies for Biomarker Stratified Clinical Trials.关于生物标志物分层临床试验的富集策略
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(2):292-308. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1379532. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
9
Adjusting for covariates in evaluating markers for selecting treatment, with application to guiding chemotherapy for treating estrogen-receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.在评估用于选择治疗的标志物时对协变量进行调整,并应用于指导雌激素受体阳性、淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的化疗。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Dec;63:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
10
Optimal treatment regimes for survival endpoints using a locally-efficient doubly-robust estimator from a classification perspective.从分类角度使用局部有效双稳健估计量的生存终点最优治疗方案。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2017 Oct;23(4):585-604. doi: 10.1007/s10985-016-9376-x. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence and predictors of sudden cardiac death in patients with diastolic heart failure.舒张性心力衰竭患者心脏性猝死的发生率及预测因素
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 Dec;18(12):1231-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00957.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
2
Standard errors for attributable risk for simple and complex sample designs.简单和复杂样本设计的归因风险标准误差。
Biometrics. 2005 Sep;61(3):847-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00355.x.
3
Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures.采用重复测量的边际结构模型对未测量的混杂因素进行敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2004 Mar 15;23(5):749-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.1657.
4
The occurrence of lung cancer in man.人类肺癌的发生。
Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum. 1953;9(3):531-41.
5
A review of adjusted estimators of attributable risk.归因风险调整估计量综述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2001 Jun;10(3):195-216. doi: 10.1177/096228020101000303.
6
Using observational data from registries to compare treatments: the fallacy of omnimetrics.利用登记处的观察性数据比较治疗方法:全指标的谬误。
Stat Med. 1984 Oct-Dec;3(4):361-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780030413.
7
Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets.检验治疗效果与患者亚组之间的定性相互作用。
Biometrics. 1985 Jun;41(2):361-72.
8
Digitalis--a new controversy regarding an old drug. The pitfalls of inappropriate methods.洋地黄——关于一种老药的新争议。不当方法的陷阱。
Circulation. 1986 Jan;73(1):14-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.1.14.