• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠电刺激治疗大便失禁:患者选择中术前评估的反应率、满意度和价值。

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: response rate, satisfaction and the value of preoperative investigation in patient selection.

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine (AP/HP), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2010 Mar;12(3):247-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01899.x. Epub 2009 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01899.x
PMID:19508523
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Before undergoing sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for faecal incontinence (FI), patients are investigated with morphologic, dynamic and electrophysiologic tests. The purpose of our study was to evaluate their value in the selection of patients who may benefit most from neuromodulation.

METHOD

If temporary stimulation resulted in a good objective response, a permanent neuromodulator was implanted. Patients were reviewed at 3 months and then at 6 monthly intervals. Asked by telephone, patient's satisfaction was described as good, satisfactory or poor.

RESULTS

Forty-five consecutive patients (41 females, median age 59 years) with FI (Wexner 16.1 +/- 2.9) underwent SNS. Temporary stimulation was successful in 32 (71)% patients. At a median follow-up of 33 months, the neuromodulator remained in place in 25 (55%) patients, two do whom switched it off, leaving 23 (51%) with a functioning neuromodulator. There was no statistically significant difference between the characteristics (including manometry, ultrasound and electrophysiology) of patients undergoing implantation (n = 32) or not (n = 13) and those with or without a functioning stimulator (n = 23: n = 13). In the 23 patients with a functioning stimulator the result was good in 12, satisfactory in five and poor in six. There was no statistically significant difference in the patient characteristics between those with a good result (n = 12) and the remainder (n = 32).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that investigation for FI does not facilitate patient selection for SNS and cannot be used to predict outcome.

摘要

目的

在接受骶神经刺激(SNS)治疗大便失禁(FI)之前,患者需要接受形态学、动力学和电生理学检查。我们的研究目的是评估这些检查在选择最可能从神经调节中获益的患者方面的价值。

方法

如果临时刺激产生了良好的客观反应,则植入永久性神经调节剂。患者在 3 个月和 6 个月时进行复查。通过电话询问,患者的满意度被描述为良好、满意或不满意。

结果

45 例连续 FI 患者(41 例女性,中位年龄 59 岁)接受了 SNS 治疗。32 例(71%)患者的临时刺激成功。中位随访 33 个月后,25 例(55%)患者仍保留神经调节剂,其中 2 例关闭,23 例(51%)仍有功能的神经调节剂。接受植入(n = 32)或未接受植入(n = 13)的患者以及有或无功能刺激器的患者(n = 23:n = 13)之间的特征(包括测压、超声和电生理学)无统计学差异。在有功能刺激器的 23 例患者中,12 例结果良好,5 例满意,6 例不满意。功能良好的患者(n = 12)和其余患者(n = 32)之间的患者特征无统计学差异。

结论

这些发现表明,FI 的检查并不能有助于 SNS 的患者选择,也不能用于预测结果。

相似文献

1
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: response rate, satisfaction and the value of preoperative investigation in patient selection.经直肠电刺激治疗大便失禁:患者选择中术前评估的反应率、满意度和价值。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Mar;12(3):247-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01899.x. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
2
Rectal volume tolerability and anal pressures in patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁患者的直肠容量耐受性和肛门压力
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jul;49(7):1039-44. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0548-8.
3
Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jul;47(7):1158-62; discussion 1162-3. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0553-8. Epub 2004 May 6.
4
[Indications and results of sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence].[骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁的适应证及结果]
Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Apr;133(2):135-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1004737.
5
Six years of experience with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁六年经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Apr;53(4):414-21. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ca7dc2.
6
Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence: are there factors associated with success?骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁:是否存在与治疗成功相关的因素?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Jan;50(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0746-4.
7
Quality of life is markedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation.骶神经刺激后,大便失禁患者的生活质量有显著改善。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):103-12. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182486e60.
8
Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence.骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁的疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Oct;54(10):1271-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182270af1.
9
Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence?对于大便失禁患者,形态完整的肛门括约肌对骶神经调节成功是否必要?
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Mar;10(3):257-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01375.x. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
10
Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: results of trial stimulation in 200 patients.预测骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁成功的因素:200 例试验性刺激的结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun;13(6):689-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02260.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Position of Sacral Neuromodulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.骶神经调节在大便失禁治疗中的现状
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):22-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714247. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
LONG-TERM EVOLUTION OF CONTINENCE AND QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER SPHINCTEROPLASTY FOR OBSTETRIC FECAL INCONTINENCE.产科粪便失禁括约肌成形术后控便能力及生活质量的长期演变
Ann Coloproctol. 2022 Feb 28;38(1):13-19. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.16. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
3
Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration.
向美国食品药品监督管理局报告的骶神经调节治疗大便失禁的不良事件。
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May 6;7(2):294-305. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.294.
4
Sacral neuromodulation and peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with anal incontinence: an overview of techniques, complications and troubleshooting.肛门失禁患者的骶神经调节和周围神经刺激:技术、并发症及故障排除概述。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014 May;2(2):112-20. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou015. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
5
Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.当前状况:治疗大便失禁患者的新技术
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2277-301. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3464-3. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
6
Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.当前粪便失禁的治疗管理:选择治疗方案以优化治疗结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 28;19(48):9216-30. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9216.
7
Sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence in the era of sacral nerve modulation.经骶神经调节治疗时代的肛门失禁括约肌成形术
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 14;16(42):5267-71. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5267.