• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从癌症特异性生活质量问卷中得出基于患者的效用指数。

Deriving a patient-based utility index from a cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire.

机构信息

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):800-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00505.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00505.x
PMID:19508665
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to derive a scoring algorithm for a validated disease-specific quality of life instrument called the Utility-Based Questionnaire-Cancer (UBQ-C) that provided a utility index designed to inform clinical decisions about cancer treatments.

METHODS

The UBQ-C includes a scale for global health status (1 item); and subscales for physical function (3 items), social/usual activities (4 items), self-care (1 item), and distresses because of physical and psychological symptoms (21 items). A scoring algorithm was derived to convert the subscales into a subset index, and combine it with the global scale into an overall health-related quality of life (HRQL) index, which was converted to a utility index with a power transformation. The valuation survey consisted of 204 advanced cancer patients who completed the UBQ-C and assigned time trade-off (TTO) utilities about their own health state. Preliminary validation involved comparing these derived utilities with other measures of HRQL.

RESULTS

Weights for the subset index were: physical function 0.28, social/usual activities 0.06, self-care 0.01, and distresses 0.64. Weights for the overall HRQL index were health status 0.65 and subset index 0.35. The mean of the utility index scores was similar to the mean of the TTO utilities (0.92 vs. 0.91, P = 0.6). The utility index was substantially correlated with other measures of HRQL.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from a simple, self-rated, disease-specific questionnaire can be converted into a utility index suitable for comparing the net effect of cancer treatments on quality of life, and to evaluate trade-offs between quality and quantity of life in quality-adjusted survival analyses.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在为经过验证的疾病特异性生活质量量表——基于效用的癌症问卷(UBQ-C)制定评分算法,该量表提供了效用指数,旨在为癌症治疗的临床决策提供信息。

方法

UBQ-C 包括一个总体健康状况量表(1 项);以及身体功能量表(3 项)、社会/日常活动量表(4 项)、自我护理量表(1 项)和因身体和心理症状而产生的痛苦量表(21 项)。我们制定了一个评分算法,将子量表转换为一个子量表指数,并将其与总体量表相结合,形成一个整体的健康相关生活质量(HRQL)指数,然后通过幂变换将其转换为效用指数。评估调查包括 204 名晚期癌症患者,他们完成了 UBQ-C 并对自己的健康状况进行了时间权衡(TTO)效用赋值。初步验证涉及将这些推导的效用与其他 HRQL 衡量标准进行比较。

结果

子量表指数的权重分别为:身体功能 0.28、社会/日常活动 0.06、自我护理 0.01、痛苦 0.64。整体 HRQL 指数的权重分别为健康状况 0.65 和子量表指数 0.35。效用指数得分的平均值与 TTO 效用的平均值相似(0.92 与 0.91,P = 0.6)。效用指数与其他 HRQL 衡量标准密切相关。

结论

来自简单的自我评估疾病特异性问卷的数据可以转换为效用指数,适用于比较癌症治疗对生活质量的净影响,并在质量调整生存分析中评估质量和生命数量之间的权衡。

相似文献

1
Deriving a patient-based utility index from a cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire.从癌症特异性生活质量问卷中得出基于患者的效用指数。
Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):800-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00505.x.
2
Preliminary validation of an optimally weighted patient-based utility index by application to randomized trials in breast cancer.通过应用于乳腺癌随机试验对基于患者的最佳加权效用指数进行初步验证。
Value Health. 2009 Sep;12(6):967-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00536.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
3
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
4
Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer.癌症患者 FACT 和 EQ-5D 量表效用评分的比较。
Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):305-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.029. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
5
Estimation of patient preference-based utility weights from the functional assessment of cancer therapy - general.从癌症治疗功能评估通用版中估计基于患者偏好的效用权重。
Value Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;10(4):266-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00181.x.
6
The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.开发一种将 Neck Disability Index (NDI)转化为颈椎疾病成本效用分析中效用评分的模型。
Spine J. 2012 Jan;12(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
7
Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease.干眼症患者的效用评估
Ophthalmology. 2003 Jul;110(7):1412-9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00462-7.
8
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
9
Pain quality of life as measured by utilities.根据效用衡量的疼痛生活质量。
Pain Med. 2014 May;15(5):865-70. doi: 10.1111/pme.12405. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
10
Assessment of health state utilities and quality of life in patients with malignant esophageal Dysphagia.恶性食管吞咽困难患者健康状态效用和生活质量的评估
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1044-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30166.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Valuation of depression co-occurring with a somatic condition: feasibility of the time trade-off task.与躯体疾病共病的抑郁症的评估:时间权衡任务的可行性。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3147-59. doi: 10.1111/hex.12303. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
2
Evaluation of content on EQ-5D as compared to disease-specific utility measures.评估 EQ-5D 与疾病特异性效用测量的内容。
Qual Life Res. 2013 May;22(4):853-74. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0207-6. Epub 2012 Jun 23.