Feagin R A, Lozada-Bernard S M, Ravens T M, Möller I, Yeager K M, Baird A H
Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Spatial Sciences Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 23;106(25):10109-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901297106. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
This study challenges the paradigm that salt marsh plants prevent lateral wave-induced erosion along wetland edges by binding soil with live roots and clarifies the role of vegetation in protecting the coast. In both laboratory flume studies and controlled field experiments, we show that common salt marsh plants do not significantly mitigate the total amount of erosion along a wetland edge. We found that the soil type is the primary variable that influences the lateral erosion rate and although plants do not directly reduce wetland edge erosion, they may do so indirectly via modification of soil parameters. We conclude that coastal vegetation is best-suited to modify and control sedimentary dynamics in response to gradual phenomena like sea-level rise or tidal forces, but is less well-suited to resist punctuated disturbances at the seaward margin of salt marshes, specifically breaking waves.
本研究挑战了盐沼植物通过活根固定土壤来防止侧向波浪侵蚀湿地边缘的范式,并阐明了植被在保护海岸中的作用。在实验室水槽研究和受控野外实验中,我们表明常见的盐沼植物并不能显著减轻湿地边缘的总侵蚀量。我们发现土壤类型是影响侧向侵蚀速率的主要变量,虽然植物不会直接减少湿地边缘侵蚀,但它们可能通过改变土壤参数间接地做到这一点。我们得出结论,海岸植被最适合应对海平面上升或潮汐力等渐进现象来改变和控制沉积动力学,但不太适合抵抗盐沼向海边缘的突发性干扰,特别是破浪。