Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Ann Bot. 2020 Feb 3;125(2):325-334. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz125.
Sand dunes reduce the impact of storms on shorelines and human infrastructure. The ability of these ecosystems to provide sustained coastal protection under persistent wave attack depends on their resistance to erosion. Although flume experiments show that roots of perennial plants contribute to foredune stabilization, the role of other plant organs, and of annual species, remains poorly studied. Furthermore, it remains unknown if restored foredunes provide the same level of erosion resistance as natural foredunes. We investigated the capacity of three widespread pioneer foredune species (the perennial Ammophila arenaria and the annuals Cakile maritima and Salsola kali) to resist dune erosion, and compared the erosion resistance of Ammophila at natural and restored sites.
Cores collected in the field were tested in a flume that simulated a wave swash. A multi-model inference approach was used to disentangle the contributions of different below-ground compartments (i.e. roots, rhizomes, buried shoots) to erosion resistance.
All three species reduced erosion, with Ammophila having the strongest effect (36 % erosion reduction versus unvegetated cores). Total below-ground biomass (roots, rhizomes and shoots), rather than any single compartment, most parsimoniously explained erosion resistance. Further analysis revealed that buried shoots had the clearest individual contribution. Despite similar levels of total below-ground biomass, coarser sediment reduced erosion resistance of Ammophila cores from the restored site relative to the natural site.
The total below-ground biomass of both annual and perennial plants, including roots, rhizomes and buried shoots, reduced dune erosion under a swash regime. Notably, we show that (1) annual pioneer species offer erosion protection, (2) buried shoots are an important plant component in driving sediment stabilization, and (3) management must consider both biological (plants and their traits) and physical (grain size) factors when integrating dunes into schemes for coastal protection.
沙丘可以减轻风暴对海岸线和人类基础设施的影响。这些生态系统在持续波浪冲击下提供持续海岸防护的能力取决于它们的抗侵蚀能力。尽管水槽实验表明,多年生植物的根系有助于促进前沙丘的稳定,但其他植物器官和一年生植物的作用仍未得到充分研究。此外,尚不清楚修复后的前沙丘是否能提供与天然前沙丘相同的抗侵蚀能力。我们研究了三种广泛分布的先锋前沙丘物种(多年生的獐茅和一年生的海雀菜和盐角草)抵抗沙丘侵蚀的能力,并比较了獐茅在前沙丘自然和修复地点的抗侵蚀能力。
在水槽中模拟波浪冲刷,对野外采集的岩芯进行测试。使用多模型推理方法来分解不同地下部分(即根系、根茎、埋藏的芽)对侵蚀阻力的贡献。
三种物种都能减少侵蚀,獐茅的效果最强(与无植被岩芯相比,减少了 36%的侵蚀)。总地下生物量(根、根茎和芽)而不是任何单一的部分,最简洁地解释了侵蚀阻力。进一步的分析表明,埋藏的芽具有最清晰的个体贡献。尽管总地下生物量相似,但较粗的沉积物降低了修复地点獐茅岩芯的抗侵蚀能力,而不是自然地点。
无论是一年生还是多年生植物,包括根系、根茎和埋藏的芽,总地下生物量都能减少在冲刷条件下的沙丘侵蚀。值得注意的是,我们表明:(1)一年生先锋物种提供侵蚀保护,(2)埋藏的芽是驱动泥沙稳定的重要植物组成部分,(3)在将沙丘纳入海岸保护计划时,管理必须同时考虑生物(植物及其特征)和物理(粒度)因素。