Burke S A, LeDue J M, Miyahara Y, Topple J M, Fostner S, Grütter P
Physics Department, McGill University, 3600 rue University, Montreal H3A 2T8, Canada.
Nanotechnology. 2009 Jul 1;20(26):264012. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/26/264012. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
There has been increasing focus on the use of Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) for the determination of local electronic structure in recent years, especially in systems where other methods, such as scanning tunnelling microscopy/spectroscopy, may be intractable. We have examined three methods for determining the local apparent contact potential difference (CPD): frequency modulation KPFM (FM-KPFM), amplitude modulation KPFM (AM-KPFM), and frequency shift-bias spectroscopy, on a test system of 3,4,9,10-perylene tetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA) on NaCl, an example of an organic semiconductor on a bulk insulating substrate. We will discuss the influence of the bias modulation on the apparent CPD measurement by FM-KPFM compared to the DC-bias spectroscopy method, and provide a comparison of AM-KPFM, AM-slope detection KPFM and FM-KPFM imaging resolution and accuracy. We will also discuss the distance dependence of the CPD as measured by FM-KPFM for both the PTCDA organic deposit and the NaCl substrate.
近年来,开尔文探针力显微镜(KPFM)在确定局部电子结构方面受到了越来越多的关注,特别是在诸如扫描隧道显微镜/光谱学等其他方法可能难以处理的系统中。我们在氯化钠上的3,4,9,10-苝四羧酸二酐(PTCDA)测试系统上研究了三种确定局部表观接触电势差(CPD)的方法:调频KPFM(FM-KPFM)、调幅KPFM(AM-KPFM)和频移-偏置光谱,该测试系统是体绝缘衬底上有机半导体的一个例子。我们将讨论与直流偏置光谱法相比,偏置调制对FM-KPFM表观CPD测量的影响,并比较AM-KPFM、AM斜率检测KPFM和FM-KPFM的成像分辨率和准确性。我们还将讨论通过FM-KPFM测量的CPD对于PTCDA有机沉积物和氯化钠衬底的距离依赖性。