Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 N.E. Pacific St., Campus Box 356429, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Aug;24(8):929-33. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1032-7. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
Research on the outcomes of pre-clinical curricula for clinical skills development is needed to assess their influence on medical student performance in clerkships.
To better understand the impact of a clinical-skills curriculum in the pre-clinical setting on student performance.
We conducted a non-randomized, retrospective, pre-post review of student performance evaluations from 3rd-year clerkships, before and after implementation of a clinical-skills curriculum, the Colleges (2001-2007).
Comparisons of clerkship performance data revealed statistically significant differences favoring the post-Colleges group in the Internal Medicine clerkship for 9 of 12 clinical-skills domains, including Technical Communication Skills (p < 0.023, effect size 0.16), Procedural Skills (p < 0.031, effect size 0.17), Communication Skills (p < 0.003, effect size 0.21), Patient Relationships (p < 0.003, effect size 0.21), Professional Relationships (p < 0.021, effect size 0.17), Educational Attitudes (p < 0.001, effect size 0.24), Initiative and Interest (p < 0.032, effect size 0.15), Attendance and Participation (p < 0.007, effect size 0.19), and Dependability (p < 0.008, effect size 0.19). Statistically significant differences were identified favoring the post-Colleges group in technical communication skills for three of six basic clerkships (Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Pediatrics).
Implementation of a pre-clinical fundamental skills curriculum appears to be associated with improved clerkship performance in the 3rd year of medical school, particularly in the Internal Medicine clerkship. Similar curricula, focused on teaching clinical skills in small groups at the bedside with personalized mentoring from faculty members, may improve student performance. Continued efforts are needed to understand how to best prepare students for clinical clerkships and how to evaluate outcomes of similar pre-clinical skills programs.
需要研究临床技能发展前临床课程的结果,以评估其对医学生在实习中的表现的影响。
更好地了解前临床环境中临床技能课程对学生表现的影响。
我们对 3 年级实习前和实施临床技能课程后的学生表现评估进行了非随机、回顾性、前后比较,该课程是医学院课程(2001-2007 年)。
比较实习表现数据显示,在 12 个临床技能领域中的 9 个领域,内科实习中以医学院课程后组具有统计学意义的优势,包括技术沟通技能(p < 0.023,效应大小 0.16)、程序技能(p < 0.031,效应大小 0.17)、沟通技能(p < 0.003,效应大小 0.21)、医患关系(p < 0.003,效应大小 0.21)、职业关系(p < 0.021,效应大小 0.17)、教育态度(p < 0.001,效应大小 0.24)、主动性和兴趣(p < 0.032,效应大小 0.15)、出勤和参与(p < 0.007,效应大小 0.19)和可靠性(p < 0.008,效应大小 0.19)。在三个基础实习(内科、外科和儿科)中,技术沟通技能也发现了以医学院课程后组具有统计学意义的优势。
实施前临床基本技能课程似乎与医学院 3 年级实习成绩的提高有关,尤其是在内科实习中。类似的课程,侧重于在床边以小组形式教授临床技能,并由教师进行个性化指导,可能会提高学生的表现。需要继续努力了解如何最好地为学生准备临床实习以及如何评估类似的前临床技能计划的结果。