Wozakowska-Kapłon Beata, Opolski Grzegorz, Kosior Dariusz, Jaskulska-Niedziela Elzbieta, Maroszyńska-Dmoch Ewa, Włosowicz Monika
1st Department of Cardiology, Centre of Cardiology, 25-736 Kielce, Poland.
Kardiol Pol. 2009 May;67(5):487-93.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for development of thromboembolic events with an annual stroke rate of 4.5%. In subjects over 80 years AF is the single leading cause of major stroke. Moreover, about 25% of patients with AF in the absence of neurological deficits have tomographic signs of one or more silent cerebral infarcts.
To investigate whether cognitive function in patients with permanent AF is significantly worse than in patients with sinus rhythm.
We included subjects aged > 65 years, without previous cerebrovascular events or dementia, with permanent arrhythmia lasting > 12 months. The AF group comprised 51 patients, aged 75.8 years. The control group consisted of 43 patients with sinus rhythm. The main points of the study protocol were: clinical history recording, physical examination, biochemical analyses, standard 12-lead ECG and transthoracic echocardiography. Cognitive status was assessed by Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Patients had established AF with a median duration of 4.9 years (range 1-21 years). Of the 51 patients, 51% had hypertension, 37% coronary artery disease, 12% presented sick sinus syndrome or atrioventricular advanced block with a VVI pacemaker implanted. There were no significant differences between the two groups though AF patients presented left ventricular hypertrophy and history of myocardial infarction more frequently. Patients in the sinus group had a lower-risk profile and received antithrombotic therapy less frequently than the AF group. However, a significant proportion of patients, particularly in the AF group received less than optimal thromboembolic prophylactic treatment with anticoagulants. Cognitive status was found to be significantly lower in the AF group, compared with the sinus rhythm group: 24.8 +/- 3.1 vs. 27.1 +/- 2.6 (p < 0.05). There were 43% patients with cognitive impairment in the AF group and 14% in the sinus rhythm group.
Permanent AF in patients aged over 65 years seems to be associated with lower MMSE score compared with subjects with sinus rhythm. Cognitive impairment in older patients is a multifactorial disorder. One of the causes of low cognitive function in these patients appears to be permanent AF. Further prospective clinical trials should help determine the possible role of inadequate anticoagulant treatment, and its association with the deterioration of cognitive function in AF patients.
心房颤动(AF)是血栓栓塞事件发生的一个危险因素,年中风发生率为4.5%。在80岁以上的人群中,AF是主要中风的单一首要原因。此外,约25%无神经功能缺损的AF患者有一个或多个无症状性脑梗死的断层扫描征象。
研究永久性AF患者的认知功能是否显著差于窦性心律患者。
我们纳入年龄>65岁、既往无脑血管事件或痴呆、永久性心律失常持续>12个月的受试者。AF组包括51例患者,年龄75.8岁。对照组由43例窦性心律患者组成。研究方案的要点包括:临床病史记录、体格检查、生化分析、标准12导联心电图和经胸超声心动图。认知状态通过简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)进行评估。
患者确诊为AF,中位病程4.9年(范围1 - 21年)。51例患者中,51%患有高血压,37%患有冠状动脉疾病,12%表现为病态窦房结综合征或植入VVI起搏器的房室传导阻滞。两组之间无显著差异,尽管AF患者左心室肥厚和心肌梗死病史更为常见。窦性心律组患者的风险特征较低,接受抗血栓治疗的频率低于AF组。然而,相当一部分患者,特别是AF组患者接受的抗凝血栓栓塞预防性治疗未达最佳。与窦性心律组相比,AF组的认知状态显著较低:24.8±3.1对27.1±2.6(p<0.05)。AF组有43%的患者存在认知障碍,窦性心律组为14%。
与窦性心律的受试者相比,65岁以上患者的永久性AF似乎与较低的MMSE评分相关。老年患者的认知障碍是一种多因素疾病。这些患者认知功能低下的原因之一似乎是永久性AF。进一步的前瞻性临床试验应有助于确定抗凝治疗不足的可能作用及其与AF患者认知功能恶化的关联。