• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立死亡率审查流程。

Establishing a mortality review process.

作者信息

Rachel Marcia M, Stewart Mary W

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Care Qual. 2009 Jul-Sep;24(3):211-22. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31819b8e45.

DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31819b8e45
PMID:19525762
Abstract

Patients die in hospitals every day; some of these deaths are expected and some are not. Each death can provide information that improves the healthcare system, care provided by healthcare professionals, and hospitalization experience for patients and their families. A standardized mortality review approach in a system focused on quality can set the stage for, and facilitate, the improvement process. This article describes the experience of an academic health center in establishing a mortality review process.

摘要

每天都有患者在医院死亡;其中一些死亡是意料之中的,而有些则并非如此。每一例死亡都能提供信息,有助于改善医疗保健系统、医护人员提供的护理以及患者及其家属的住院体验。在一个注重质量的系统中,采用标准化的死亡率审查方法可以为改进过程奠定基础并加以推动。本文介绍了一家学术医疗中心建立死亡率审查流程的经验。

相似文献

1
Establishing a mortality review process.建立死亡率审查流程。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2009 Jul-Sep;24(3):211-22. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31819b8e45.
2
Long-term acute care hospitals: one hospital's experience.
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008 Jan-Mar;31(1):46-51. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000306396.25024.9f.
3
Development of an outcomes management program at an academic medical center.一所学术医疗中心成果管理项目的开展。
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1996 May-Jun;1(3):118-25.
4
Patient first: a tri-fold approach to health care transformation.患者至上:医疗保健转型的三重方法。
Semin Nurse Manag. 2002 Jun;10(2):105-9.
5
The academic medical center and patient satisfaction.
Qual Manag Health Care. 2008 Oct-Dec;17(4):275-9. doi: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000338548.59770.ad.
6
Reorganizing an academic medical center in a period of change.在变革时期重组学术医疗中心。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1994 Fall;3(1):25-36.
7
Performance improvement review: implementation of total quality in medical information services.绩效改进评估:医疗信息服务中全面质量管理的实施
Top Health Inf Manage. 1993 Nov;14(2):57-76.
8
Preventable mortality: does the perspective matter when determining preventability?可预防死亡率:在确定可预防性时,视角是否重要?
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.069. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
9
The ins and outs of operations improvement at OSUMC (Ohio State University Medical Center).俄亥俄州立大学医学中心(OSUMC)运营改进的来龙去脉。
QRC Advis. 1995 Jan;11(3):6-8.
10
Putting the needs of the patient first: Mayo Clinic's core value, institutional culture, and professionalism covenant.将患者需求置于首位:梅奥诊所的核心价值观、机构文化与职业操守公约。
Acad Med. 2007 Nov;82(11):1089-93. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181575dcd.

引用本文的文献

1
Competing risk survival analysis of time to in-hospital death or discharge in a large urban neonatal unit in Kenya.肯尼亚一家大型城市新生儿病房住院死亡或出院时间的竞争风险生存分析。
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Jun 17;4:96. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15302.1. eCollection 2019.
2
Measuring faculty reflection on adverse patient events: development and initial validation of a case-based learning system.测量教师对不良患者事件的反思:基于案例学习系统的开发与初步验证。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Mar;26(3):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1548-x. Epub 2010 Oct 27.