Arcus-anchored acellular dermal graft compared to anterior colporrhaphy for stage II cystoceles and beyond.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study is to compare acellular dermal matrix to standard colporrhaphy for cystocele repair.

METHODS

One hundred two patients with greater than or equal to stage II anterior prolapse (Aa or Ba 0) who underwent anterior colporrhaphy with acellular dermal implant attached to the arcus between October 2003 and February 2007 were compared to 89 controls who received standard anterior colporrhaphy. Objective recurrence was defined as greater than or equal to stage II (Aa or Ba -1).

RESULTS

The dermal graft and colporrhaphy groups were comparable in age, parity, body mass index, and concomitant surgeries except hysteropexy and hysterectomy. Regression was performed for possible confounders. Postoperatively, 14 (19%) recurrences were identified in the dermal graft group vs. 26 (43%) in the colporrhaphy group (p = 0.004). Two patients underwent reoperations for cystocele recurrence in the study group vs. four in the control group. Time to normal voiding, subjective stress urinary incontinence, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Dermal acellular matrix provides benefit over standard colporrhaphy.