Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌患者中促红细胞生成素刺激剂的使用:风险评估

Use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents in breast cancer patients: a risk review.

作者信息

Crouch Zachary, DeSantis Evelyn R Hermes

机构信息

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jul 1;66(13):1180-5. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080214.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The treatment of cancer-induced anemia with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Before the introduction of ESAs, the only treatment option for cancer-related anemia was red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. The use of ESAs in multiple disease states has been well established and is now considered first-line treatment for many forms of anemia. Chang et al. evaluated the effect of epoetin alfa (40,000 units administered subcutaneously every week) and standard-of-care therapy on quality of life (QOL), transfusion requirements, and hemoglobin levels in 354 patients with breast cancer who had a baseline hemoglobin concentration of <15 g/dL. The authors concluded that early initiation of treatment with epoetin alfa in patients with breast cancer is effective in maintaining hemoglobin levels, reducing transfusions, and improving QOL. Leyland-Jones et al. conducted a study evaluating the effects of early intervention with epoetin alfa (40,000 units administered subcutaneously every week) on survival and QOL of mainly nonanemic patients with metastatic breast cancer. In contrast to Chang et al., this study was discontinued because of lower overall survival rates within the epoetin alfa group. In 2008, the Food and Drug Administration issued a black-box warning for both epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. The warning acknowledges that ESAs have shortened overall survival and time to disease progression in patients with advanced breast cancer who are given these agents to achieve a target hemoglobin concentration of > or =12 g/dL.

CONCLUSION

When used in patients with cancer-induced anemia, ESAs should only be given at the lowest dose possible to prevent RBC transfusions. During treatment, hemoglobin levels should be monitored closely and ESA doses need to be adjusted accordingly.

摘要

目的

对使用促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESAs)治疗癌症相关性贫血进行综述。

总结

在ESAs问世之前,癌症相关性贫血的唯一治疗选择是输注红细胞(RBC)。ESAs在多种疾病状态下的应用已得到充分证实,现被视为多种贫血形式的一线治疗方法。Chang等人评估了促红细胞生成素α(每周皮下注射40,000单位)和标准护理疗法对354例基线血红蛋白浓度<15 g/dL的乳腺癌患者的生活质量(QOL)、输血需求和血红蛋白水平的影响。作者得出结论,乳腺癌患者早期开始使用促红细胞生成素α治疗可有效维持血红蛋白水平、减少输血并改善QOL。Leyland-Jones等人进行了一项研究,评估早期使用促红细胞生成素α(每周皮下注射40,000单位)对主要为非贫血转移性乳腺癌患者生存和QOL的影响。与Chang等人的研究相反,该研究因促红细胞生成素α组总体生存率较低而提前终止。2008年,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对促红细胞生成素α和达贝泊汀α发布了黑框警告。该警告指出,对于接受这些药物以达到目标血红蛋白浓度≥12 g/dL的晚期乳腺癌患者,ESAs会缩短其总体生存期和疾病进展时间。

结论

用于治疗癌症相关性贫血时,ESAs应仅以尽可能低的剂量给药以预防RBC输血。治疗期间,应密切监测血红蛋白水平,并相应调整ESA剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验