Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam ACTA, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Jun;14(3):339-45. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0298-9. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
The aim of the study was to assess the influence of four mandibular protrusion positions, at a constant vertical dimension, on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Seventeen OSA patients (49.2 +/- 8.5 years) received an adjustable mandibular advancement device (MAD). The patients underwent four polysomnographic recordings with their MAD in situ at, in random order, 0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% of the maximum protrusion. The mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) values of the patients differed significantly between the protrusion positions (P < 0.000). The 25% protrusion position resulted in a significant reduction of the AHI with respect to the 0% position, while in the 50% and 75% positions, even lower AHI values were found. The number of side effects was larger starting at the 50% protrusion position. We therefore recommend coming to a weighted compromise between efficacy and side effects by starting a MAD treatment in the 50% protrusion position.
本研究旨在评估在恒定垂直尺寸下四种下颌前伸位置对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的影响。17 名 OSA 患者(49.2±8.5 岁)接受了可调节下颌前伸装置(MAD)的治疗。患者在 MAD 处于 0%、25%、50%和 75%最大前伸的位置时,分别进行了四次多导睡眠图记录,顺序随机。患者的平均呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)值在不同的前伸位置之间差异显著(P<0.000)。与 0%位置相比,25%的前伸位置使 AHI 显著降低,而在 50%和 75%的位置,发现了更低的 AHI 值。从 50%的前伸位置开始,副作用的数量增加。因此,我们建议通过在 50%的前伸位置开始 MAD 治疗来在疗效和副作用之间达成加权妥协。