Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Department of Research, Drøbak, Norway.
Injury. 2010 May;41(5):444-52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.027. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
Scandinavian countries face common challenges in trauma care. It has been suggested that Scandinavian trauma system development is immature compared to that of other regions. We wanted to assess the current status of Scandinavian trauma management and system development.
An extensive search of the Medline/Pubmed, EMBASE and SweMed+ databases was conducted. Wide coverage was prioritized over systematic search strategies. Scandinavian publications from the last decade pertaining to trauma epidemiology, trauma systems and early trauma management were included.
The incidence of severe injury ranged from 30 to 52 per 100,000 inhabitants annually, with about 90% due to blunt trauma. Parts of Scandinavia are sparsely populated with long pre-hospital distances. In accordance with other European countries, pre-hospital physicians are widely employed and studies indicate that this practice imparts a survival benefit to trauma patients. More than 200 Scandinavian hospitals receive injured patients, increasingly via multidisciplinary trauma teams. Challenges remain concerning pre-hospital identification of the severely injured. Improved triage allows for a better match between patient needs and the level of resources available. Trauma management is threatened by the increasing sub-specialisation of professions and institutions. Scandinavian research is leading the development of team- and simulation-based trauma training. Several pan-Scandinavian efforts have facilitated research and provided guidelines for clinical management.
Scandinavian trauma research is characterised by an active collaboration across countries. The current challenges require a focus on the role of traumatology within an increasingly fragmented health care system. Regional networks of predictable and accountable pre- and in-hospital resources are needed for efficient trauma systems. Successful development requires both novel research and scientific assessment of imported principles of trauma care.
斯堪的纳维亚国家在创伤护理方面面临着共同的挑战。有人认为,与其他地区相比,斯堪的纳维亚创伤系统的发展还不成熟。我们希望评估斯堪的纳维亚创伤管理和系统发展的现状。
我们对 Medline/Pubmed、EMBASE 和 SweMed+数据库进行了广泛搜索。优先考虑广泛覆盖,而不是系统搜索策略。纳入了过去十年中有关创伤流行病学、创伤系统和早期创伤管理的斯堪的纳维亚出版物。
严重损伤的发生率为每年每 10 万人 30 至 52 例,其中约 90%是钝性创伤。斯堪的纳维亚的部分地区人口稀少,院前距离长。与其他欧洲国家一样,广泛使用了院前医生,研究表明,这种做法对创伤患者有生存获益。200 多家斯堪的纳维亚医院收治受伤患者,越来越多的是通过多学科创伤团队。在院前识别重伤患者方面仍然存在挑战。改进的分诊可以更好地匹配患者的需求和可用资源的水平。创伤管理受到职业和机构日益专业化的威胁。斯堪的纳维亚的研究正在引领基于团队和模拟的创伤培训的发展。一些泛斯堪的纳维亚的努力促进了研究,并为临床管理提供了指南。
斯堪的纳维亚的创伤研究的特点是各国之间的积极合作。当前的挑战需要关注创伤学在日益碎片化的医疗保健系统中的作用。需要建立可预测和负责的院前和院内资源的区域网络,以实现有效的创伤系统。成功的发展既需要新的研究,也需要对创伤护理的导入原则进行科学评估。