Radiology and Physics Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jun;74(3):e154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.041. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
The aim of this study was to investigate (a) the effect the choice of the region of interest (ROI) defining the aortic input function (AIF) has on the estimation of renal perfusion and filtration in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) renography, and (b) the reproducibility of these parameters. Using renal DCE-MRI and a three-compartment model analysis, this work evaluated the effect two different AIFs, derived from variable sized ROIs in the aorta, has on calculating DCE-MRI renal perfusion and filtration values in a group of healthy adult volunteers who underwent two consecutive renal DCE-MRI studies.
Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent two DCE-MRI studies under similar physiological conditions. Oblique-coronal DCE-MRI data volumes were acquired on a 1.5 T Siemens Avanto scanner with a 3D-FLASH pulse-sequence (TE/TR=0.53/1.63 ms, flip angle=17 degrees , acquisition matrix=128 x 104 voxels, strong fat saturation, PAT factor=2 (GRAPPA) and 400 mm x 325 mm FOV). Each dynamic dataset consisted of 18 slices of 7.5mm thickness (no gap) and an in-plane resolution of 3.1 mm x 3.1mm, acquired every 2.5s for not less than 5 minutes. During the MR scan a dose of 0.05 m mol (0.1 mL)kg(-1) body weight of dimeglumine gadopentetate (Magnevist) was injected intravenously (2 mLs(-1) injection rate), followed by a 15 mL saline flush at the same rate, using a MR-compatible automated injector (Spectris). Two AIFs were defined for each volunteer by drawing two ROIs in the aorta for each study. Renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values were then calculated for each of the AIFs using a modified Tofts Renal Model (TRM). Both renal perfusion and GFR were expressed in mL min(-1)100 mL(-1) of tissue.
Inter-individual reproducibility tests for renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rate showed that the size of AIF ROIs significantly affects calculated values of perfusion and GFR (p-values <0.02). No significant differences were observed when comparing perfusion and GFR values in the same volunteer between scans performed on different days (p-values >0.22). From our study we conclude that while DCE-MRI derived indices of renal function are reproducible in the same individual when imaged on different days, the size of the aortic ROI and hence the AIF has a significant influence on calculated renal perfusion and GFR values. Currently there is no accepted standard for drawing the aortic ROI and no standardized approach for the AIF definition in renal DCE-MRI studies.
本研究旨在探讨(a)在动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像(MRI)肾图中,选择定义主动脉输入函数(AIF)的感兴趣区(ROI)对估计肾灌注和滤过的影响,以及(b)这些参数的可重复性。本研究使用肾 DCE-MRI 和三室模型分析,评估了两种不同 AIF 在一组接受两次连续肾 DCE-MRI 研究的健康成年志愿者中计算 DCE-MRI 肾灌注和滤过值的效果,这两种 AIF 是从主动脉中不同大小的 ROI 中获得的。
15 名健康志愿者在相似的生理条件下接受了两次 DCE-MRI 研究。使用西门子 Avanto 1.5T 扫描仪上的 3D-FLASH 脉冲序列(TE/TR=0.53/1.63ms,翻转角=17°,采集矩阵=128x104 体素,强脂肪饱和,PAT 因子=2(GRAPPA)和 400mmx325mm FOV)采集斜冠状面 DCE-MRI 数据体积。每个动态数据集由 18 个 7.5mm 厚的切片组成(无间隙),并且具有 3.1mmx3.1mm 的平面分辨率,以不小于 5 分钟的 2.5s 的间隔采集。在 MR 扫描期间,静脉内注射 0.05 m mol(0.1mL/kg)体重的二亚甲基戊二胺钆喷替酸(Magnevist)(2mL/s 注射速率),随后以相同的速率注射 15mL 生理盐水冲洗,使用与 MR 兼容的自动注射器(Spectris)。为每位志愿者定义了两种 AIF,为每次研究在主动脉中绘制两个 ROI。然后使用改良的 Tofts 肾脏模型(TRM)为每个 AIF 计算肾灌注和肾小球滤过率(GFR)值。肾灌注和 GFR 均以 mL min-1 100mL-1 组织表示。
肾灌注和肾小球滤过率的个体内可重复性测试表明,AIF ROI 的大小显著影响灌注和 GFR 的计算值(p 值<0.02)。在不同日期进行的扫描中,对同一志愿者的灌注和 GFR 值进行比较时,未观察到显著差异(p 值>0.22)。我们的研究得出结论,虽然在不同日期对同一个体进行成像时,DCE-MRI 衍生的肾功能指数具有可重复性,但主动脉 ROI 的大小以及因此 AIF 对计算的肾灌注和 GFR 值有显著影响。目前,在肾 DCE-MRI 研究中,尚无绘制主动脉 ROI 的公认标准,也没有标准化的 AIF 定义方法。