Stivers Tanya, Enfield N J, Brown Penelope, Englert Christina, Hayashi Makoto, Heinemann Trine, Hoymann Gertie, Rossano Federico, de Ruiter Jan Peter, Yoon Kyung-Eun, Levinson Stephen C
Language and Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6525XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10587-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Informal verbal interaction is the core matrix for human social life. A mechanism for coordinating this basic mode of interaction is a system of turn-taking that regulates who is to speak and when. Yet relatively little is known about how this system varies across cultures. The anthropological literature reports significant cultural differences in the timing of turn-taking in ordinary conversation. We test these claims and show that in fact there are striking universals in the underlying pattern of response latency in conversation. Using a worldwide sample of 10 languages drawn from traditional indigenous communities to major world languages, we show that all of the languages tested provide clear evidence for a general avoidance of overlapping talk and a minimization of silence between conversational turns. In addition, all of the languages show the same factors explaining within-language variation in speed of response. We do, however, find differences across the languages in the average gap between turns, within a range of 250 ms from the cross-language mean. We believe that a natural sensitivity to these tempo differences leads to a subjective perception of dramatic or even fundamental differences as offered in ethnographic reports of conversational style. Our empirical evidence suggests robust human universals in this domain, where local variations are quantitative only, pointing to a single shared infrastructure for language use with likely ethological foundations.
非正式言语互动是人类社会生活的核心基质。协调这种基本互动模式的一种机制是轮流发言系统,该系统规定了谁在何时发言。然而,对于这个系统在不同文化中的差异,我们所知甚少。人类学文献报道了日常对话中轮流发言时间存在显著的文化差异。我们对这些说法进行了检验,结果表明,事实上在对话中反应潜伏期的潜在模式存在显著的普遍性。我们从传统本土社区的语言到主要世界语言选取了全球范围内的10种语言样本,结果表明,所有测试语言都提供了明确证据,证明普遍避免重叠交谈,并将对话轮次之间的沉默时间减至最短。此外,所有语言都显示出相同的因素可以解释语言内部反应速度的差异。不过,我们确实发现不同语言在轮次之间的平均间隔上存在差异,与跨语言均值相差250毫秒。我们认为,对这些节奏差异的自然敏感度会导致人们主观上认为对话风格的民族志报告中所呈现的差异非常显著甚至是根本性的。我们的实证证据表明,在这个领域存在强大的人类普遍性,其中局部差异仅是数量上的,这表明存在一个可能具有行为学基础的单一共享语言使用基础设施。