Suppr超能文献

[经胸超声心动图引导下经心尖心包穿刺术]

[Echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis with the apical approach].

作者信息

Ozer Hasan Orhan, Davutoğlu Vedat, Cakici Musa, Doğan Adnan, Sari Ibrahim, Oylumlu Mustafa, Aksoy Mehmet

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Medicine Faculty of Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2009 Apr;37(3):177-81.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate our experience with echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis with the apical approach for pericardial effusions.

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated 32 pericardiocenteses performed under echocardiography guidance and with the apical approach in 29 patients (15 men, 14 women; mean age 49 years; range 18 to 72 years). Indications were diagnostic purpose, pericardial tamponade, or symptomatic pericardial effusion. Procedural success, the amount of drainage, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Common causes of pericardial effusion were malignancy (n=6), postpericardiotomy syndrome (n=5), idiopathic (n=5), chronic renal disease (n=4), and myocardial infarction (n=3). The amount of drainage was 120 ml to 2,200 ml and the duration of pericardial catheter placement in the pericardial space was 24 to 144 hours. Mortality did not occur. Echocardiographic control showed residual effusion in the lateral wall in one case, which required repositioning of the pericardial catheter for complete removal. The procedure failed in one patient due to insufficient drainage caused by multiple septations and fibrinous fluid in the pericardial space. The success rate of the procedures was 96.9%. Four cases developed hemopneumothorax requiring tube drainage, vasovagal reaction, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and frequent ventricular extrasystoles, respectively. Apical puncture was repeated in two cases due to erroneous left ventricular puncture and pleural catheter placement, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis with the apical approach is readily performed bedside without the need for catheterization laboratory, with a high success rate and low complication rate. It should be considered especially in cases in which anterior pericardial collection is more prominent where it will reduce unnecessary surgical interventions.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估经超声心动图引导采用心尖入路进行心包穿刺引流心包积液的经验。

研究设计

我们评估了29例患者(15例男性,14例女性;平均年龄49岁;范围18至72岁)在超声心动图引导下采用心尖入路进行的32次心包穿刺术。适应证为诊断目的、心包填塞或有症状的心包积液。评估手术成功率、引流量及并发症情况。

结果

心包积液的常见病因包括恶性肿瘤(n = 6)、心包切开术后综合征(n = 5)、特发性(n = 5)、慢性肾病(n = 4)及心肌梗死(n = 3)。引流量为120毫升至2200毫升,心包导管在心包腔内留置时间为24至144小时。无死亡病例。超声心动图检查显示1例患者侧壁有残留积液,需要重新放置心包导管以完全清除积液。1例患者因心包腔内有多个分隔和纤维蛋白样液体导致引流不充分,手术失败。手术成功率为96.9%。4例患者分别出现需要胸腔闭式引流的血气胸、血管迷走反应、非持续性室性心动过速和频发室性早搏。2例患者分别因误穿左心室和误置胸膜导管而重复进行心尖穿刺。

结论

经超声心动图引导采用心尖入路进行心包穿刺术可在床边轻松完成,无需导管室,成功率高且并发症发生率低。尤其在有心包前侧积液较明显的情况下应考虑采用,可减少不必要的外科干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验