Sherer M, Parsons O A, Nixon S J, Adams R L
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991 Sep;13(5):741-51. doi: 10.1080/01688639108401087.
The interpretive significance of the Speech-Sounds Perception Test (SSPT) and the Seashore Rhythm Test (SRT) was evaluated through literature review and empirical investigations. Subjects were 43 pseudoneurologic controls and 81 brain-damaged persons, divided into subgroups of subjects with left-hemisphere damage (n = 20), diffuse brain damage (n = 31), and right-hemisphere damage (n = 30). Our data indicate that the SSPT and SRT failed to discriminate left- and right-hemisphere damage. Furthermore, discriminant analyses demonstrated that these tests make no unique diagnostic contribution within the context of a neuropsychological battery. We question whether these tests should be routinely used.
通过文献综述和实证研究，对言语声音感知测试（SSPT）和海滨节律测试（SRT）的解释意义进行了评估。研究对象包括43名假性神经症对照者和81名脑损伤患者，后者又被分为左半球损伤组（n = 20）、弥漫性脑损伤组（n = 31）和右半球损伤组（n = 30）。我们的数据表明，SSPT和SRT无法区分左半球和右半球损伤。此外，判别分析表明，在神经心理测试组合的背景下，这些测试没有独特的诊断价值。我们质疑这些测试是否应常规使用。
