Husk Jesse S, Bennett Patrick J, Sekuler Allison B
McMaster University, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ont., Canada L8S 4K1.
Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(27):3350-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.09.017. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
Faces, more than other objects, are identified more accurately when upright than inverted. This inversion effect may be linked to differences in expertise. Here, we explore how stimulus characteristics and expertise interact to determine the magnitude of inversion effects. Observers were trained to identify houses or textures. Inversion effects were not found with either stimulus before training, but were found following 5 days of practice. Additionally, the learning-induced inversion effects showed partial transfer to novel exemplars. Although similar amounts of learning were observed with both types of stimuli, inversion effects were significantly larger for textures. Our results suggest that the size of the inversion effect is not a reliable index of face-specific processing.
与其他物体相比,面部在正立时比倒置时能更准确地被识别。这种倒置效应可能与专业知识的差异有关。在这里,我们探讨刺激特征和专业知识如何相互作用以确定倒置效应的大小。观察者接受训练以识别房屋或纹理。训练前,两种刺激均未发现倒置效应,但经过5天的练习后发现了倒置效应。此外,学习诱导的倒置效应显示出部分转移到新的示例。尽管两种刺激观察到的学习量相似,但纹理的倒置效应明显更大。我们的结果表明,倒置效应的大小不是面部特定加工的可靠指标。