Suppr超能文献

具有不良预后特征的生殖细胞肿瘤患者挽救性大剂量化疗的长期结果。

Long-term outcome of salvage high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumor with poor prognostic features.

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Hematology, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo-Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2011 May-Jun;29(3):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.030. Epub 2009 Jun 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) represents an option as salvage treatment for patients with resistant/refractory germ cell tumor (GCT). The objective of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the long-term results of a single-center experience with salvage HDCT for GCT patients, and to validate the prognostic model proposed by Einhorn and colleagues [9].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1986 and 2003, 100 GCT patients received salvage HDCT consisting of high-doses of carboplatin, etoposide ± cyclophosphamide, or ifosfamide. Twenty-four patients underwent a second HDCT cycle, and in 1 case, a third cycle was given with a median interval time of 6 weeks (range, 5-10).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 8 years (range, 3-17); 6 of 32 (19%) patients with resistant GCT and 1 of 19 (5%) patients with cisplatin-refractory disease have been continuously disease-free, while none of the 16 patients with absolutely cisplatin-refractory GCT were alive at 1 year from HDCT treatment. In the PBPC era, HDCT appeared to be inapplicable in 32% of patients, mainly due to progressive disease during the induction/mobilizing phase. The prognostic model by Einhorn et al. for tandem HDCT did categorize our patients treated with a single HDCT cycle or low-dose intensity regimens in a very similar manner, but with inferior overall results.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results with a single HDCT cycle or a low dose-intensity multicycle HDCT regimen remained poor in patients with adverse prognostic features. The tandem HDCT regimen represents a major option for refractory GCTs and relapsed tumors in third-line or later therapy, while a single course of HDCT should be abandoned for these patients.

摘要

目的

高剂量化疗(HDCT)是挽救耐药/难治性生殖细胞瘤(GCT)患者的一种选择。本回顾性分析的目的是评估单中心采用挽救性 HDCT 治疗 GCT 患者的长期结果,并验证 Einhorn 等人提出的预后模型[9]。

材料与方法

1986 年至 2003 年间,100 例 GCT 患者接受了挽救性 HDCT,方案包括高剂量卡铂、依托泊苷±环磷酰胺或异环磷酰胺。24 例患者接受了第二个 HDCT 周期,1 例患者接受了第三个周期,中位间隔时间为 6 周(范围为 5-10 周)。

结果

中位随访 8 年(范围为 3-17 年);32 例耐药 GCT 患者中有 6 例(19%)和 19 例顺铂耐药患者中的 1 例(5%)持续无病,而 16 例绝对顺铂耐药 GCT 患者无一例在 HDCT 治疗后 1 年存活。在 PBPC 时代,HDCT 在 32%的患者中似乎不适用,主要是由于诱导/动员阶段疾病进展。Einhorn 等人的用于串联 HDCT 的预后模型将我们接受单周期 HDCT 或低剂量强度方案治疗的患者进行了非常相似的分类,但总体结果较差。

结论

对于具有不良预后特征的患者,单次 HDCT 周期或低剂量强度多周期 HDCT 方案的长期结果仍然较差。串联 HDCT 方案是难治性 GCT 和三线或更晚治疗中复发肿瘤的主要选择,而对于这些患者,应放弃单疗程 HDCT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验