Petrelli Fausto, Coinu Andrea, Rosti Giovanni, Pedrazzoli Paolo, Barni Sandro
Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Oncology Unit, Giovanni Paolo II Hospital, Olbia, OT, Italy.
Med Oncol. 2017 Aug;34(8):133. doi: 10.1007/s12032-017-0990-6. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
Relapsed germ cell tumor (GCT) is a highly curable cancer with standard-dose platinum-based chemotherapy (CT); however, high-dose CT (HDCT) is seldom used as salvage therapy instead or after conventional CT. We conducted a systematic review of published trials to compare outcomes between standard-dose CT and HDCT in patients with relapsed GCT after first-line therapy for advanced disease. A literature search was carried out in multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library), and studies reporting salvage treatment of relapsed GCT with standard-dose or carboplatin-etoposide-based HDCT were selected. Overall response rate, median overall survival (OS), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were pooled, and the significance of difference between arms was assessed with a Chi-square test. Twenty-nine standard-dose and 31 HD studies were included in the meta-analysis. For standard-dose CT versus HDCT, there was no significant difference in median OS (14.8 months and 24.09 months, respectively; P = 0.09) or in 1-, 2-, 3-, or 5-year survival rate (standard-dose CT, 64.2, 63.6, 45.1, and 43%, respectively; HDCT, 63.7, 51.2, 46.7, and 45%, respectively; P = 0.9, P = 0.4, P = 0.75, and P = 0.06). Conventional dose regimens and HDCT were associated with comparable efficacy when used as salvage therapies in relapsed GCTs as second-line therapy or beyond. However, the selection of ideal candidates for more or less intensive treatments deserves further research in the near future.
复发性生殖细胞肿瘤(GCT)是一种采用标准剂量铂类化疗(CT)可高度治愈的癌症;然而,高剂量CT(HDCT)很少被用作挽救性治疗,无论是替代传统CT还是在其之后使用。我们对已发表的试验进行了系统评价,以比较一线治疗晚期疾病后复发的GCT患者接受标准剂量CT和HDCT的疗效。在多个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆)中进行了文献检索,并选择了报告用标准剂量或基于卡铂-依托泊苷的HDCT挽救治疗复发性GCT的研究。汇总总体缓解率、中位总生存期(OS)以及1年、2年、3年和5年OS率,并通过卡方检验评估两组之间差异的显著性。荟萃分析纳入了29项标准剂量和31项HD研究。对于标准剂量CT与HDCT,中位OS(分别为14.8个月和24.09个月;P = 0.09)或1年、2年、3年或5年生存率(标准剂量CT分别为64.2%、63.6%、45.1%和43%;HDCT分别为63.7%、51.2%、46.7%和45%;P = 0.9、P = 0.4、P = 0.75和P = 0.06)均无显著差异。当用作复发性GCT的二线或更后续挽救性治疗时,传统剂量方案和HDCT的疗效相当。然而,选择或多或少强化治疗的理想候选者在不久的将来值得进一步研究。