• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肌钙蛋白生物标志物在急性冠状动脉综合征危险分层中的增量价值:这种关系是相乘的吗?

The incremental value of troponin biomarkers in risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes: is the relationship multiplicative?

作者信息

Amin Amit P, Nathan Sandeep, Vassallo Patricia, Calvin James E

机构信息

The John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County (Cook County Hospital), Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2009 May 20;3:39-47. doi: 10.2174/1874192400903010039.

DOI:10.2174/1874192400903010039
PMID:19557150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2701278/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To emphasize the importance of troponin in the context of a new score for risk stratifying acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients. Although troponins have powerful prognostic value, current ACS scores do not fully capitalize this prognostic ability. Here, we weigh troponin status in a multiplicative manner to develop the TRACS score from previously published Rush score risk factors (RRF).

METHODS

2,866 ACS patients (46.7% troponin positive) from 9 centers comprising the TRACS registry, were randomly split into derivation (n=1,422) and validation (n=1,444) cohorts. In the derivation sample, RRF sum was multiplied by 3 if troponins were positive to yield the TRACS score, which was grouped into five categories of 0-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-11, 12-15 (multiples of 3). Predictive performance of this score to predict hospital death was ascertained in the validation sample.

RESULTS

The TRACS score had ROC AUC of 0.71 in the validation cohort. Logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, likelihood-ratio and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) test indicated that weighing troponin status with 3 in the TRACS score improved the prediction of mortality. Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated sound model fit.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that weighing troponin as a multiple of 3 yields robust prognostication of hospital mortality in ACS patients, when used in the context of the TRACS score.

摘要

目的

强调肌钙蛋白在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者风险分层新评分中的重要性。尽管肌钙蛋白具有强大的预后价值,但目前的ACS评分并未充分利用这种预后能力。在此,我们以乘法方式考量肌钙蛋白状态,根据先前发表的拉什评分风险因素(RRF)制定TRACS评分。

方法

来自9个中心的2866例ACS患者(46.7%肌钙蛋白阳性)纳入TRACS注册研究,随机分为推导队列(n = 1422)和验证队列(n = 1444)。在推导样本中,如果肌钙蛋白呈阳性,RRF总和乘以3得出TRACS评分,该评分分为0 - 2、3 - 5、6 - 8、9 - 11、12 - 15(3的倍数)五个类别。在验证样本中确定该评分预测医院死亡的预测性能。

结果

在验证队列中,TRACS评分的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.71。逻辑回归、Kaplan - Meier分析、似然比和贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)检验表明,在TRACS评分中以3考量肌钙蛋白状态可改善死亡率预测。Hosmer - Lemeshow检验表明模型拟合良好。

结论

我们证明,在TRACS评分背景下,将肌钙蛋白乘以3进行考量,可对ACS患者的医院死亡率产生可靠的预后评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/944dbb9212a4/TOCMJ-3-39_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/026392d21a6f/TOCMJ-3-39_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/056cbe197f24/TOCMJ-3-39_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/1be89bcef110/TOCMJ-3-39_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/944dbb9212a4/TOCMJ-3-39_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/026392d21a6f/TOCMJ-3-39_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/056cbe197f24/TOCMJ-3-39_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/1be89bcef110/TOCMJ-3-39_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/2701278/944dbb9212a4/TOCMJ-3-39_F4.jpg

相似文献

1
The incremental value of troponin biomarkers in risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes: is the relationship multiplicative?肌钙蛋白生物标志物在急性冠状动脉综合征危险分层中的增量价值:这种关系是相乘的吗?
Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2009 May 20;3:39-47. doi: 10.2174/1874192400903010039.
2
N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide assessment provides incremental prognostic information in patients with acute coronary syndromes and normal troponin T values upon admission.入院时肌钙蛋白T值正常的急性冠脉综合征患者,N末端B型利钠肽评估可提供额外的预后信息。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Mar 25;51(12):1188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.054.
3
Incremental prognostic value of biomarkers beyond the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.GRACE(全球急性冠状动脉事件注册)评分和高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T 之外的生物标志物对非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的预后增值作用。
Clin Chem. 2013 Oct;59(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.206185. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
4
Prognostic performance of kinetic changes of high-sensitivity troponin T in acute coronary syndrome and in patients with increased troponin without acute coronary syndrome.高敏肌钙蛋白T动力学变化在急性冠状动脉综合征及肌钙蛋白升高但无急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的预后价值
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;174(3):524-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.110. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
5
Predictive value of NT-proBNP for 30-day mortality in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a comparison with the GRACE and TIMI risk scores.NT-proBNP对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者30天死亡率的预测价值:与GRACE和TIMI风险评分的比较
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Nov 21;12:471-476. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S117204. eCollection 2016.
6
ProACS risk score: An early and simple score for risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes.ProACS风险评分:一种用于急性冠脉综合征患者风险分层的早期简易评分。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2017 Feb;36(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2016.05.010. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
7
External validation of the ProACS score for risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者风险分层的ProACS评分的外部验证
Rev Port Cardiol. 2016 Jun;35(6):323-8. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2015.11.010. Epub 2016 May 30.
8
Ability of troponins to predict adverse outcomes in patients with renal insufficiency and suspected acute coronary syndromes: a case-matched study.肌钙蛋白预测肾功能不全及疑似急性冠脉综合征患者不良结局的能力:一项病例匹配研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Feb;33(2):471-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00592-0.
9
Improved risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes using a combination of hsTnT, NT-proBNP and hsCRP with the GRACE score.采用 hsTnT、NT-proBNP 和 hsCRP 联合 GRACE 评分对急性冠脉综合征患者进行改良危险分层。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Mar;7(2):129-138. doi: 10.1177/2048872616684678. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
10
Troponin and Other Biomarker Levels and Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Derivation and Validation of the HAT COVID-19 Mortality Risk Score.肌钙蛋白和其他生物标志物水平与 COVID-19 住院患者结局:HAT COVID-19 死亡率风险评分的推导和验证。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e018477. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018477. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.心血管试验中复合终点使用的问题:随机对照试验的系统评价
BMJ. 2007 Apr 14;334(7597):786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39136.682083.AE. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
2
Risk prediction in patients presenting with suspected cardiac pain: the GRACE and TIMI risk scores versus clinical evaluation.疑似心脏疼痛患者的风险预测:GRACE和TIMI风险评分与临床评估对比
QJM. 2007 Jan;100(1):11-8. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl133. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
3
Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set.
GRACE(全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究)急性冠状动脉综合征预测模型对独立数据集中出院后6个月死亡情况的预测效度。
Heart. 2006 Jul;92(7):905-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.073122. Epub 2005 Dec 30.
4
Value of community-derived risk models for stratifying patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Eur Heart J. 2005 May;26(9):851-2. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi214. Epub 2005 Mar 21.
5
TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS.TIMI、PURSUIT和GRACE风险评分:非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征中的持续预后价值及与血运重建的相互作用
Eur Heart J. 2005 May;26(9):865-72. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi187. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
6
Clinical trial--derived risk model may not generalize to real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome.来自临床试验的风险模型可能不适用于现实世界中的急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
Am Heart J. 2004 Dec;148(6):1020-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.014.
7
Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty?随机试验中的复合结局:更高的精确性但伴随着更大的不确定性?
JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2554-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2554.
8
Scores for post-myocardial infarction risk stratification in the community.社区心肌梗死后风险分层评分
Circulation. 2002 Oct 29;106(18):2309-14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036598.12888.de.
9
ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2002年不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南更新——总结篇:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南特别工作组(不稳定型心绞痛患者管理委员会)报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 2;40(7):1366-74. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02336-7.
10
Mechanisms behind the prognostic value of troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: a FRISC II substudy.肌钙蛋白T在不稳定型冠状动脉疾病中预后价值背后的机制:FRISC II亚研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Oct;38(4):979-86. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01501-7.