Suppr超能文献

侵袭性念珠菌感染的抗真菌治疗:一项混合治疗比较的荟萃分析。

Antifungal treatment for invasive Candida infections: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mills Edward J, Perri Dan, Cooper Curtis, Nachega Jean B, Wu Ping, Tleyjeh Imad, Phillips Peter

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009 Jun 26;8:23. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-8-23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of mortality among patients at risk. Treatment guidelines vary on optimal treatment strategies. We aimed to determine the effects of different antifungal therapies on global response rates, mortality and safety.

METHODS

We searched independently and in duplicate 10 electronic databases from inception to May 2009. We selected any randomized trial assessing established antifungal therapies for confirmed cases of invasive candidiasis among predominantly adult populations. We performed a meta-analysis and then conducted a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison to differentiate treatment effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses included dosage forms of amphotericin B and fluconazole compared to other azoles.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 11 studies enrolling a total of 965 patients. For our primary analysis of global response rates, we pooled 7 trials comparing azoles to amphotericin B, Relative Risk [RR] 0.87 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.78-0.96, P = 0.007, I2 = 43%, P = 0.09. We also pooled 2 trials of echinocandins versus amphotericin B and found a pooled RR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.99-1.23, P = 0.08). One study compared anidulafungin to fluconazole and yielded a RR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.06-1.51) in favor of anidulafungin. We pooled 7 trials assessing azoles versus amphotericin B for all-cause mortality, resulting in a pooled RR of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.05, P = 0.17, I2 = 0%, P = 0.96). Echinocandins versus amphotericin B (2 trials) for all-cause mortality resulted in a pooled RR of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84-1.20, P = 0.93). Anidulafungin versus fluconazole resulted in a RR of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.48-1.10, P = 0.34). Our mixed treatment comparison analysis found similar within-class effects across all interventions. Adverse event profiles differed, with amphotericin B exhibiting larger adverse event effects.

CONCLUSION

Treatment options appear to offer preferential effects on response rates and mortality. When mycologic data are available, therapy should be tailored.

摘要

目的

侵袭性真菌感染是高危患者死亡的主要原因。关于最佳治疗策略的治疗指南各不相同。我们旨在确定不同抗真菌疗法对总体缓解率、死亡率和安全性的影响。

方法

我们独立且重复检索了从数据库建立至2009年5月的10个电子数据库。我们选择了任何一项评估针对主要成年人群确诊的侵袭性念珠菌病的既定抗真菌疗法的随机试验。我们进行了荟萃分析,然后进行贝叶斯混合治疗比较以区分治疗效果。敏感性分析包括两性霉素B和氟康唑与其他唑类药物相比的剂型。

结果

我们的分析纳入了11项研究,共965例患者。对于我们对总体缓解率的初步分析,我们汇总了7项比较唑类与两性霉素B的试验,相对风险[RR]为0.87(95%置信区间[CI],0.78 - 0.96,P = 0.007,I² = 43%,P = 0.09)。我们还汇总了2项棘白菌素与两性霉素B对比的试验,发现汇总后的RR为1.10(95% CI,0.99 - 1.23,P = 0.08)。一项研究比较了阿尼芬净与氟康唑,结果显示RR为1.26(95% CI,1.06 - 1.51),支持阿尼芬净。我们汇总了7项评估唑类与两性霉素B全因死亡率的试验,汇总后的RR为0.88(95% CI,0.74 - 1.05,P = 0.17,I² = 0%,P = 0.96)。棘白菌素与两性霉素B对比全因死亡率(2项试验)的汇总RR为1.01(95% CI,0.84 - 1.20,P = 0.93)。阿尼芬净与氟康唑对比的RR为0.73(95% CI,0.48 - 1.10,P = 0.34)。我们的混合治疗比较分析发现所有干预措施在同类效应方面相似。不良事件情况有所不同,两性霉素B的不良事件影响更大。

结论

治疗方案似乎对缓解率和死亡率有优先影响。当有真菌学数据可用时,治疗应个体化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cda1/2713200/76a56afcfb44/1476-0711-8-23-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验