• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Safety of drug-eluting stents: demystifying network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pocock Stuart J

出版信息

Lancet. 2007 Dec 22;370(9605):2099-100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61898-4.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61898-4
PMID:18156025
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Safety of drug-eluting stents: demystifying network meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架的安全性：解读网状Meta分析
Lancet. 2007 Dec 22;370(9605):2099-100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61898-4.
2
Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架相关的结局：一项协作网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):937-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61444-5.
3
Drug-eluting stents and late stent thrombosis.药物洗脱支架与晚期支架内血栓形成
Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):914-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61424-X.
4
Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.急性心肌梗死患者中雷帕霉素洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较：随机试验的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Jan 21;146(2):234-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
5
Clinical outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床结局：来自综合网络荟萃分析的证据。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 6;62(6):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.022. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
6
Clinical safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease.比较依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的临床安全性和疗效。
Ann Med. 2011 Feb;43(1):75-9. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.543924. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
7
[Drug-eluting stents: do they keep their promises?].
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2006 Apr 12;95(15):581-3. doi: 10.1024/0369-8394.95.15.581.
8
Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study.西罗莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架在常规临床实践中的早期和晚期冠状动脉支架血栓形成：来自一项大型双机构队列研究的数据。
Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):667-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60314-6.
9
Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents.西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱冠状动脉支架的安全性与有效性
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):998-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067193. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
10
Drug-eluting coronary stents: many meta-analyses, little benefit.药物洗脱冠状动脉支架：众多荟萃分析，获益寥寥。
Prescrire Int. 2009 Apr;18(100):70-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence.冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入术：当前技术与证据回顾。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(1):e060422203185. doi: 10.2174/1573403X18666220406113517.
2
Single, immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials using different drugs.非肌层浸润性膀胱癌术后单次即刻化疗：使用不同药物的随机临床试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 19;7(29):45479-45488. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9991.
3
What guidance are researchers given on how to present network meta-analyses to end-users such as policymakers and clinicians? A systematic review.
在如何向政策制定者和临床医生等终端用户展示网络荟萃分析方面，研究人员获得了哪些指导？一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 17;9(12):e113277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113277. eCollection 2014.
4
[Basic concepts for network meta-analysis].[网络荟萃分析的基本概念]
Aten Primaria. 2014 Dec;46(10):573-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 May 5.
5
Crystalline glucosamine sulfate in the management of knee osteoarthritis: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic properties.硫酸氨基葡萄糖晶体在膝骨关节炎治疗中的疗效、安全性和药代动力学特性。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2012 Jun;4(3):167-80. doi: 10.1177/1759720X12437753.
6
Estimating the power of indirect comparisons: a simulation study.估计间接比较的功效：一项模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 21;6(1):e16237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016237.
7
International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.五个司法管辖区的比较有效性研究的国际比较：对美国的启示。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000.
8
Safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation MI: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者血栓切除术的安全性和有效性：随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010 Feb 26;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-10-10.
9
Incorporating multiple interventions in meta-analysis: an evaluation of the mixed treatment comparison with the adjusted indirect comparison.在荟萃分析中纳入多种干预措施：混合治疗比较与调整间接比较的评估
Trials. 2009 Sep 21;10:86. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-86.
10
Antifungal treatment for invasive Candida infections: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.侵袭性念珠菌感染的抗真菌治疗：一项混合治疗比较的荟萃分析。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009 Jun 26;8:23. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-8-23.