Kullberg B J, Sobel J D, Ruhnke M, Pappas P G, Viscoli C, Rex J H, Cleary J D, Rubinstein E, Church L W P, Brown J M, Schlamm H T, Oborska I T, Hilton F, Hodges M R
Nijmegen University Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (484), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (541), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Lancet. 2005;366(9495):1435-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67490-9.
Voriconazole has proven efficacy against invasive aspergillosis and oesophageal candidiasis. This multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority study compared voriconazole with a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for the treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients.
Non-neutropenic patients with a positive blood culture for a species of candida and clinical evidence of infection were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, either voriconazole (n=283) or amphotericin B followed by fluconazole (n=139). The primary efficacy analysis was based on clinical and mycological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment, assessed by an independent data-review committee unaware of treatment assignment.
Of 422 patients randomised, 370 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. Voriconazole was non-inferior to amphotericin B/fluconazole in the primary efficacy analysis, with successful outcomes in 41% of patients in both treatment groups (95% CI for difference -10.6% to 10.6%). At the last evaluable assessment, outcome was successful in 162 (65%) patients assigned voriconazole and 87 (71%) assigned amphotericin B/fluconazole (p=0.25). Voriconazole cleared blood cultures as quickly as amphotericin B/fluconazole (median time to negative blood culture, 2.0 days). Treatment discontinuations due to all-cause adverse events were more frequent in the voriconazole group, although most discontinuations were due to non-drug-related events and there were significantly fewer serious adverse events and cases of renal toxicity than in the amphotericin B/fluconazole group.
Voriconazole was as effective as the regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole in the treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, and with fewer toxic effects.
There are several options for treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, including amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and echinocandins. Voriconazole can be given both as initial intravenous treatment and as an oral stepdown agent.
伏立康唑已被证明对侵袭性曲霉病和食管念珠菌病有效。这项多中心、随机、非劣效性研究比较了伏立康唑与两性霉素B联合氟康唑方案治疗非中性粒细胞减少患者念珠菌血症的疗效。
纳入血培养念珠菌属阳性且有感染临床证据的非中性粒细胞减少患者。患者按2:1的比例随机分配,分别接受伏立康唑治疗(n = 283)或两性霉素B联合氟康唑治疗(n = 139)。主要疗效分析基于治疗结束后12周的临床和真菌学反应,由一个不知道治疗分配情况的独立数据审查委员会进行评估。
在随机分组的422例患者中,370例被纳入改良意向性治疗人群。在主要疗效分析中,伏立康唑不劣于两性霉素B/氟康唑,两个治疗组中均有41%的患者获得成功结局(差异的95%置信区间为-10.6%至10.6%)。在最后一次可评估的评估中,接受伏立康唑治疗的162例(65%)患者和接受两性霉素B/氟康唑治疗的87例(71%)患者结局成功(p = 0.25)。伏立康唑清除血培养的速度与两性霉素B/氟康唑一样快(血培养转阴的中位时间为2.0天)。伏立康唑组因各种原因不良事件导致的治疗中断更为频繁,不过大多数中断是由于与药物无关的事件,且严重不良事件和肾毒性病例明显少于两性霉素B/氟康唑组。
在治疗非中性粒细胞减少患者的念珠菌血症方面,伏立康唑与两性霉素B联合氟康唑方案同样有效,且毒性作用更少。
治疗非中性粒细胞减少患者念珠菌血症有多种选择,包括两性霉素B、氟康唑、伏立康唑和棘白菌素类。伏立康唑既可以作为初始静脉治疗药物,也可以作为口服降阶梯药物使用。