Suppr超能文献

并非所有的罗伊评分都是一样的!你使用的是哪种罗伊评分?

Not all Rowe scores are the same! Which Rowe score do you use?

作者信息

Jensen Kai-Uwe, Bongaerts Genio, Bruhn Raphael, Schneider Silke

机构信息

Arthro Clinic Institute, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;18(4):511-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Rowe score is an internationally recognized scoring system for the postoperative assessment of Bankart repairs; however, there are 4 different Rowe score versions. All 4 versions are used in parallel and results are sometimes published without any information about the Rowe score version used. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the correlation and agreement of the various Rowe score versions.

METHOD

Sixty-two patients were scheduled for follow-up examination after arthroscopic Bankart repair. All 4 Rowe score versions were used. The results of all Rowe scores were compared and correlation and agreement evaluated.

RESULT

The evaluation revealed significant differences. The highest mean score was observed in the 1988 Rowe score (Ø 88.7 points) and the lowest mean score in the 1981 Rowe score (Ø 73.6 points).

CONCLUSION

Not all Rowe scores are the same! Therefore, the used Rowe score should always be indicated. It would be desirable to establish one single Rowe score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3; Diagnostic study.

摘要

背景

罗伊评分是国际公认的用于评估Bankart修复术后情况的评分系统;然而,有4种不同版本的罗伊评分。这4种版本同时被使用,并且结果有时在未提及所使用的罗伊评分版本的任何信息的情况下就被发表。因此,本研究的目的是评估不同版本罗伊评分之间的相关性和一致性。

方法

62例患者计划在关节镜下Bankart修复术后进行随访检查。使用了所有4种罗伊评分版本。比较了所有罗伊评分的结果,并评估了相关性和一致性。

结果

评估显示存在显著差异。1988年罗伊评分的平均得分最高(平均88.7分),1981年罗伊评分的平均得分最低(平均73.6分)。

结论

并非所有罗伊评分都是相同的!因此,应始终注明所使用的罗伊评分。建立一个单一的罗伊评分是可取的。

证据水平

3级;诊断性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验