Cook James R, Kilmer Ryan P
Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223-0001, USA.
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Feb;33(1):18-20. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.05.006. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
The definition of a system of care (SOC) can guide those intending to develop and sustain SOCs. Hodges, Ferreira, Israel, and Mazza [Hodges, S., Ferreira, K., Israel, N., & Mazza, J. (in press). Systems of care, featherless bipeds, and the measure of all things. Evaluation and Program Planning] have emphasized contexts in which services are provided to families, plus the adaptive, dynamic, complex nature of systems and multiple components that comprise SOCs. However, two areas need additional clarification: (1) the nature of the "system" of concern in a "system of care," and how it should differ from a "service delivery system"; and (2) the degree to which intended, or desired, outcomes of a SOC extend beyond increased access to "necessary" services and supports. These prime issues in the conceptualization of SOCs are addressed, drawing on ecological theory to underscore the need for broader systems--including factors in the proximal and distal contexts of children and families--to be engaged in the process of promoting well-being and helping children and families function and participate fully in their communities. A revised definition is proposed, with implications for the implementation of SOCs.
照护系统(SOC)的定义能够为那些打算开发并维持照护系统的人提供指导。霍奇斯、费雷拉、伊斯雷尔和马扎[霍奇斯,S.,费雷拉,K.,伊斯雷尔,N.,&马扎,J.(即将出版)。照护系统、无毛两足动物与万物的衡量标准。《评估与项目规划》]强调了向家庭提供服务的背景,以及构成照护系统的系统和多个组成部分的适应性、动态性和复杂性。然而,有两个领域需要进一步阐明:(1)“照护系统”中所关注的“系统”的性质,以及它与“服务提供系统”的区别;(2)照护系统预期或期望的结果超出增加获得“必要”服务和支持的程度。本文借鉴生态理论来强调需要更广泛的系统——包括儿童和家庭近端及远端背景中的因素——参与到促进福祉以及帮助儿童和家庭充分发挥功能并全面融入其社区的过程中,从而解决了照护系统概念化中的这些主要问题。本文提出了一个修订后的定义,并对照护系统的实施具有启示意义。