Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 28223-0001, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Dec;46(3-4):332-41. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9350-9.
This paper emphasizes the value of family-centered care. Discussion highlights family-centered philosophies (e.g., Systems of Care [SOCs]) and practice models (i.e., wraparound) and identifies discrepancies between conceptualizations and actual practice. Data from multiple sources detail issues in fidelity to family-centered values and needs and risks experienced by siblings of children with severe emotional disturbance and their caregivers. This discussion provides a springboard for policy recommendations to strengthen family support programming and enhance family-centered care, from modifying funding streams such that systems extend their reach beyond children with full-blown, diagnosable problems (those meeting standards of "medical necessity), to supporting prevention and early intervention initiatives that address families as targets for intervention. Recommendations include ensuring that communities with SOC funding address the needs of families; broadening Medicaid rules and definitions; expanding the range of reimbursable activities and services; and increasing funding for evaluating family-centered care models and family support programming.
本文强调了以家庭为中心的护理的价值。讨论重点介绍了以家庭为中心的理念(例如,照顾系统 [SOCs])和实践模式(即全面照顾),并指出了概念化和实际实践之间的差异。来自多个来源的数据详细说明了对家庭为中心的价值观和需求的忠实程度的问题,以及严重情绪障碍儿童的兄弟姐妹及其照顾者所经历的风险。本次讨论为加强家庭支持计划和增强以家庭为中心的护理提供了政策建议的基础,建议包括修改资金流,使系统超越全面诊断、有“医疗必要性”的儿童,扩大预防和早期干预计划,将家庭作为干预目标。建议包括确保有 SOC 资金的社区满足家庭的需求;放宽医疗补助的规则和定义;扩大可报销活动和服务的范围;并增加用于评估以家庭为中心的护理模式和家庭支持计划的资金。