Rigotti N A, Pashos C L
Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
JAMA. 1991 Dec 11;266(22):3162-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.266.22.3162.
To assess the prevalence, content, and growth of state and city laws restricting smoking in public places and workplaces in the United States and to identify factors associated with their passage.
A mailed survey of city clerks in US cities with a population of 25,000 or greater (N = 980) and review of existing data sources confirmed the status of smoking restrictions in 902 (92%) of the cities in the sample. State laws were identified by contacting each state's Legislative Reference Bureau (100% response). Content of laws was coded using previously developed categories.
Prevalence, comprehensiveness, and cumulative incidence of no-smoking laws in states and in cities with a population of 25,000 or greater.
By July 1989, 44 states and 500 (51%) of the cities in our sample had adopted some smoking restriction, but content varied widely. While 42% of cities limited smoking in government buildings, 27% in public places, 24% in restaurants, and 18% in private workplaces, only 17% of cities and 20% of states had comprehensive laws restricting smoking in all four of these sites. The number of city no-smoking laws increased tenfold from 1980 to 1989. City no-smoking laws were independently associated with population size, geography, state tobacco production, and adult smoking prevalence. Laws were more common in larger cities, Western cities, and states with fewer adult smokers. Laws were less common in tobacco-producing states and in the South.
No-smoking laws are more widespread than previously appreciated, especially at the local level, reflecting a rapid pace of city government action in the 1980s. Nonetheless, comprehensive laws, which are most likely to provide meaningful protection from environmental tobacco smoke exposure, remain uncommon and represent a major gap in smoking control policy. Laws are most needed in smaller and non-Western cities and in states that produce tobacco and have a higher proportion of smokers.
评估美国各州及城市限制在公共场所和工作场所吸烟的法律的普及程度、内容及发展情况,并确定与这些法律通过相关的因素。
对美国人口在25000及以上的城市的市政书记员进行邮寄调查(N = 980),并查阅现有数据源以确认样本中902个(92%)城市的吸烟限制状况。通过联系每个州的立法参考局确定州法律(回复率100%)。法律内容使用先前制定的类别进行编码。
人口在25000及以上的各州及城市无烟法律的普及程度、全面性和累积发生率。
到1989年7月,我们样本中的44个州和500个(51%)城市已实施了一些吸烟限制措施,但内容差异很大。虽然42%的城市限制在政府大楼吸烟,27%限制在公共场所,24%限制在餐馆,18%限制在私人工作场所,但只有17%的城市和20%的州有全面的法律限制在所有这四个场所吸烟。城市无烟法律的数量从1980年到1989年增加了九倍。城市无烟法律与人口规模、地理位置、州烟草产量和成人吸烟率独立相关。法律在大城市、西部城市和成人吸烟者较少的州更为常见。在烟草生产州和南部,法律则较少见。
无烟法律比以前认为的更为普遍,尤其是在地方层面,这反映了20世纪80年代市政府行动的快速步伐。尽管如此,最有可能提供有意义的保护以防止接触环境烟草烟雾的全面法律仍然不常见,这是吸烟控制政策中的一个重大差距。在较小的非西部城市以及烟草生产州且吸烟者比例较高的州,最需要法律。