NBER, UC Irvine, Economics, Irvine, CA, USA.
Health Econ. 2010 Dec;19(12):1425-40. doi: 10.1002/hec.1559.
A large literature has documented relationships between state clean indoor air laws (SCIALs) and smoking-related outcomes in the United States. These laws vary within states over time and across venues such as schools, government buildings, and bars. Few studies, however, have evaluated whether the effects of SCIALs are plausibly concentrated among workers who should have been directly affected because they worked at locations covered by the venue-specific restrictions. We fill this gap in the literature using data on private sector workers, government employees, school workers, eating and drinking place workers, and bartenders from the 1992-2007 Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey. Our quasi-experimental models indicate robust effects of SCIALs restricting smoking in bars: these laws significantly increased the presence of workplace smoking restrictions as reported by bartenders and reduced the fraction of bartenders who smoke. We do not, however, find that SCIALs in private workplaces, government workplaces, schools, or restaurants increased the presence of workplace smoking restrictions among groups of workers working in venues covered by these laws. This suggests that the smoking reductions associated with SCIALs in previous research are unlikely to have been directly caused by effects of workplace smoking restrictions on workers.
大量文献记录了美国州级清洁室内空气法(SCALs)与吸烟相关结果之间的关系。这些法律随着时间的推移在各州内以及在学校、政府大楼和酒吧等场所发生变化。然而,很少有研究评估 SCALs 的影响是否可能集中在那些应该直接受到影响的工人身上,因为他们在受场地特定限制的地点工作。我们使用 1992-2007 年《当前人口调查》烟草使用补充调查中私营部门工人、政府雇员、学校工人、饮食场所工人和调酒师的数据填补了这一文献空白。我们的准实验模型表明,限制酒吧吸烟的 SCALs 具有显著影响:这些法律显著增加了调酒师报告的工作场所吸烟限制的存在,并减少了吸烟调酒师的比例。然而,我们没有发现私营工作场所、政府工作场所、学校或餐馆的 SCALs 增加了在这些法律涵盖的场所工作的工人群体的工作场所吸烟限制的存在。这表明,先前研究中与 SCALs 相关的吸烟减少不太可能直接归因于工作场所吸烟限制对工人的影响。