Solagberu B A, Ofoegbu C K P, Abdur-Rahman L O, Adekanye A O, Udoffa U S, Taiwo J
Department of Surgery, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital Ilorin, Nigeria.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2009 Mar;12(1):29-33.
Efficient pre-hospital transport (emergency medical services, EMS) is associated with improved outcomes in road traffic injuries (RTI). This study aims to discover possible interventions in the existing mode of transport.
Persons bringing all RTI victims to the Emergency room (ER) over a 4-year period and the injury arrival intervals were noted prospectively.
There were 2,624 patients (1,886 males and 738 females); only 2,046 (78%) had clear documentations of three categories of persons bringing victims to ER: Relatives (REL, 1,081, 52.83%); Police/Federal Road Safety Corps (P/F, 827, 40.42%) and Bystanders (BS, 138, 6.74%). No intervention was provided during transport: Within 1 hour, 986 victims (48.2% of 2,046) arrived ERbrought by P/F (448, 21.9%), REL (439, 21.5% of 2,046), and BS (99, 4.8%). These figures, in each instance, represent 40.6 % of total victims brought by REL; 54.2% by P/F and 71.7% by BS. However, after 6 hours, REL were the main active group as they brought 94.5% (359 of 380) patients of this period. In 91 victims (4.4%) the injury arrival time was not captured.
This study has identified three groups of persons involved in pre-hospital transport with nearly 50% getting to ER within 1 hour without any intervention or prior notification of ER. Absence of EMS obscures pre-hospital death records. The P/F responsible for only 40% of transport should be trained and equipped to offer basic trauma life support (BTLS). The REL and BS (both responsible for 60% of transport) represent a pool of volunteers for BTLS to be trained.
高效的院前转运(紧急医疗服务,EMS)与道路交通伤(RTI)患者预后改善相关。本研究旨在探寻现有转运模式中可能的干预措施。
前瞻性记录4年间所有将道路交通伤受害者送至急诊室(ER)的人员以及受伤至送达的时间间隔。
共有2624例患者(1886例男性和738例女性);仅有2046例(78%)有明确记录显示有三类人员将受害者送至急诊室:亲属(REL,1081例,52.83%);警察/联邦道路安全部队(P/F,827例,40.42%)和旁观者(BS,138例,6.74%)。转运过程中未提供任何干预措施:1小时内,986例受害者(占2046例的48.2%)抵达急诊室,其中由P/F送来的有448例(21.9%),亲属送来的有439例(占2046例的21.5%),旁观者送来的有99例(4.8%)。在每种情况下,这些数字分别占亲属送来的受害者总数的40.6%;P/F送来的占54.2%,旁观者送来的占71.7%。然而,6小时后,亲属成为主要的活跃群体,因为他们送来的患者占这一时期的94.5%(380例中的359例)。91例受害者(4.4%)的受伤至送达时间未记录。
本研究确定了参与院前转运的三类人员,近50%的患者在1小时内抵达急诊室,且没有任何干预措施或提前通知急诊室。缺乏EMS导致院前死亡记录不明。负责仅40%转运工作的P/F应接受培训并配备设备以提供基本创伤生命支持(BTLS)。亲属和旁观者(两者负责60%的转运工作)可作为接受BTLS培训的志愿者群体。