Meijer Henny J A, Raghoebar Gerry M, Batenburg Rutger H K, Vissink Arjan
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Sep;36(9):799-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01442.x. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period.
Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction.
The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ<ITI, p<0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups.
It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.
本前瞻性对照研究旨在评估IMZ种植系统(两阶段圆柱型)、布伦马克种植系统(两阶段螺旋型)和ITI种植系统(一阶段螺旋型)在下颌覆盖义齿修复中,经过10年随访期后的生存率、种植体周围组织状况、患者满意度以及手术和修复后护理情况。
选取三组共30例无牙颌患者,在下颌孔间区域植入两颗骨内种植体。在修复治疗完成后以及功能负载1年、5年和10年后,对临床和影像学参数进行评估。在评估期间,对修复和手术的后续护理情况以及患者满意度进行评分。
IMZ组10年生存率为93%,布伦马克组为98%,ITI组为100%(IMZ组低于ITI组,p<0.05)。在10年期间,平均边缘骨吸收有限。各组之间在满意度和后续护理方面未观察到差异。
得出结论,在下颌孔间区域植入两颗种植体并连接连接杆,可为无牙颌患者的下颌覆盖义齿提供合适的支撑基础。10年后,三种种植系统之间未出现相关变化。