Division of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE, UK.
Addiction. 2009 Jul;104(7):1251-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02605.x.
To examine the acute effects of a guided relaxation routine (body scan) and isometric exercise on desire to smoke and tobacco withdrawal symptoms.
Experimental comparison of three conditions.
Forty-eight individuals reporting smoking > or =10 cigarettes daily.
Random assignment to one of three interventions delivered via a 10-minute audio: isometric exercise (IE, n = 14), body scanning (BS, n = 18) or a reading about natural history (control group, n = 16). Interventions were delivered twice on the same day: in the laboratory, then in their 'normal' environment.
Desire to smoke (primary outcome) and withdrawal symptoms were rated at pre-intervention and up to 30 minutes post-intervention.
Controlling for baseline scores, post-intervention desire to smoke and withdrawal symptoms were significantly lower for IE and BS groups, compared with the controls, in both environments. There were no significant differences for IE versus BS. For desire to smoke, controlling for baseline values, ratings in the laboratory were significantly lower for IE and BS versus the control up to 30 minutes post-intervention. In the normal environment, these ratings were significantly lower only up to 5 minutes post-intervention.
Brief IE and BS interventions are effective for reducing desire to smoke and withdrawal symptoms in temporarily abstaining smokers. These interventions were found to be more effective in the laboratory than in the smoker's normal environment, but this may be an artefact of there not being a sufficient 'wash-out' period between interventions. These techniques may be beneficial for managing desire to smoke and tobacco withdrawal.
研究指导放松程序(身体扫描)和等长运动对吸烟欲望和烟草戒断症状的急性影响。
三种情况的实验比较。
48 名报告每天吸烟≥10 支的个体。
通过 10 分钟的音频随机分配到三种干预措施之一:等长运动(IE,n = 14)、身体扫描(BS,n = 18)或阅读自然史(对照组,n = 16)。干预措施在同一天进行两次:在实验室,然后在他们的“正常”环境中。
在干预前和干预后 30 分钟评估吸烟欲望(主要结果)和戒断症状。
控制基线评分,与对照组相比,IE 和 BS 组在两种环境下的干预后吸烟欲望和戒断症状明显降低。IE 与 BS 之间无显著差异。对于吸烟欲望,控制基线值,在实验室中,IE 和 BS 组的评分明显低于对照组,直到干预后 30 分钟。在正常环境中,这些评分仅在干预后 5 分钟内显著降低。
简短的 IE 和 BS 干预措施可有效减少暂时戒烟者的吸烟欲望和戒断症状。与在吸烟者的正常环境中相比,这些干预措施在实验室中更有效,但这可能是干预之间没有足够的“冲洗”期的一种人为现象。这些技术可能有助于管理吸烟欲望和烟草戒断。