Suppr超能文献

高效液相色谱-串联质谱法分析水中10种农药:膜辅助溶剂萃取与固相萃取的比较

High performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of 10 pesticides in water: a comparison between membrane-assisted solvent extraction and solid phase extraction.

作者信息

van Pinxteren Manuela, Bauer Coretta, Popp Peter

机构信息

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2009 Jul 31;1216(31):5800-6. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.06.027. Epub 2009 Jun 13.

Abstract

This work describes the application of two sample preparation methods: membrane-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) in combination with high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS-MS) for the determination of 10 pesticides in surface and ground water. Optimal extraction conditions for MASE were 60 min extraction time at 30 degrees C with a solvent volume of 100 microL toluene. 5 microL of the toluene extract were directly injected in the HPLC-MS-MS system. Concerning SPE, two materials were tested and C18 was superior to Oasis HLB. Complete desorption was ensured by desorbing the SPE (C18) cartridge with 3 mL of an acetonitrile/methanol mixture (1:1). After evaporation, the extract was injected in the analytical system. Analyte breakthrough was not found for the investigated compounds. For both methods, high extraction yields were achieved, in detail 71% (metalaxyl) till 105% (linuron) for MASE and 52% (ethiofencarb) till 77% (prometryne) for SPE (C18). Detection limits were in the low ng/L range for both methods and precision, expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the peak areas was below 13%. Five real water samples were analyzed applying both extraction methods. The results were in good agreement and standard addition proved that no matrix effects (such as ion suppression) occurred. In this comparison SPE has the potential of larger sensitivity whereas faster analysis and slightly better recoveries were achieved with MASE. MASE shows potential to be a promising alternative to the conventional off-line SPE concerning low to medium polar compounds.

摘要

本研究描述了两种样品前处理方法的应用

膜辅助溶剂萃取(MASE)和固相萃取(SPE),并结合高效液相色谱 - 串联质谱法(HPLC - MS - MS)用于测定地表水和地下水中的10种农药。MASE的最佳萃取条件为:在30℃下萃取60分钟,溶剂体积为100微升甲苯。将5微升甲苯萃取物直接注入HPLC - MS - MS系统。关于SPE,测试了两种材料,C18优于Oasis HLB。通过用3毫升乙腈/甲醇混合物(1:1)解吸SPE(C18)柱确保完全解吸。蒸发后,将萃取物注入分析系统。在所研究的化合物中未发现分析物穿透现象。对于这两种方法,均实现了高萃取率,具体而言,MASE的萃取率为71%(甲霜灵)至105%(利谷隆),SPE(C18)的萃取率为52%(乙硫甲威)至77%(扑草净)。两种方法的检测限均在低纳克/升范围内,精密度以峰面积的相对标准偏差(RSD)表示,低于13%。应用两种萃取方法分析了五个实际水样。结果吻合良好,标准加入法证明未出现基质效应(如离子抑制)。在此比较中,SPE具有更高灵敏度的潜力,而MASE实现了更快的分析速度和略好的回收率。对于低至中等极性的化合物,MASE显示出有望成为传统离线SPE的有前景的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验